The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nes01

    nes01 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,956
    1
    Jul 24, 2011
    You continually show that you know nothing about this particular sport, which is expected after naming yourself after some type of schoolyard bullying. I cant speak to too many other sports, but in boxing what matters is WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED, not what could have/would have/should have happened. We dont care about imaginary achievements over here.
     
  2. Lopetego

    Lopetego Guest

    lol Floyd

    his best victory ever is diego corrales
     
  3. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    a lot of his fans are counting hypothetical wins and a win by proxy. :lol:
     
  4. lunchmoneypunch

    lunchmoneypunch Member Full Member

    278
    0
    Jan 29, 2011
    It's not about the mythical match up but is about the CREDENTIALED OBSERVERS. They ALMOST unanimously agree that Mayweather is better.

    The common opponent thing is just embarrassing. Not even one thinks PACQUIAO is better. AMAZING.
     
  5. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    erik morales is a better fighter (maybe on par with dlh...floyd with a close sd) than anyone floyd has fought.
     
  6. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    is that why Pac lost to him :think
     
  7. Lopetego

    Lopetego Guest

    They're just a pathetic bunch of nuthuggers trying to make his cherrypicking disgrace of an idol look better

    Pac's victories over the mexican Warriors-3 **** all over Floyd's resume
     
  8. EJDiaZ

    EJDiaZ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,213
    420
    Aug 21, 2010
    Whatever you guys say, Pac is higher than FMJ in the ATG list, nothing will change lol Pac/FMJ are cemented ATG's, but Pac is higher (BarerraMoralesMarquezCotto)
     
  9. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Pac, he has Void running from him!!! Void has been running from his for years now!
     
  10. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Floyd has wins over 2 of those guys
     
  11. nes01

    nes01 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,956
    1
    Jul 24, 2011
    Haha. What are the "credentialied observers", observing? Lol. They sure didnt observe any fight between Floyd and any ATG, let alone Pacquiao.

    Look man, youre just speaking ass. In boxing, real achievements count, not shoulda-woulda-coulda achievements or credentialed-observer achievements. We're not factoring into this debate who Floyd would have beaten. There's no squaring this circle.
     
  12. The_Destroyer

    The_Destroyer Active Member Full Member

    1,376
    4
    Dec 20, 2012
    everybody knows pac lost to morales because of the cut he suffered from an accidental headbutt, it was not a boxing lesson.. it was war at its best.

    pac fought with one eye.. c'mon he deserves credit for that.

    then morales move up in weight (135) to fight raheem, everybody knows he was bloated during fight night. Then he got destroyed by Pac in fight # 2 at his best weight and still in Prime
     
  13. BoxingX

    BoxingX Active Member Full Member

    1,186
    2
    Aug 17, 2013
    Castillo 1 was a loss, there's no way to score it for Floyd. Best you can give Floyd is a 2 point loss vs. Castillo, very clear.
     
  14. jaymon112

    jaymon112 MARVELOUS Full Member

    2,846
    10
    Mar 14, 2012
    No, ****en hell you know fuck all about boxing.
     
  15. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011


    Resume wise, Pacquiao but skill wise is Mayweather... but Pac needs to win big in the next fight or 2 for people to start talking about May-Pac 2014.. but at this point it looks blurry......
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.