ricky burns

So he should get more money in case there's another poor decision?

You're talking sh!t mate, but you know, you can believe what you want. That's your prerogative.

 

awnser the question if you was beltran would you?
what is it i believe please let me know
i know what i seen and that it was a total fuc king robberry just whitout shotguns
you really think beltran would not get a shot at a different world title :huh
burns needs to put the record stright not beltran :deal

 

Why do they deserve credit for doing the right thing? Beltran is the true champion, not Burns.

 

What a stupid question - if I was a competitive boxer would I take a world title fight. Of course I would.

Robberies happen from time to time in boxing; as a precedent that doesn't mean any subsequent fights (or fighters) are obliged for a greater purse.

Beltran obviously has a massive stake in that fight just as much as Burns does.

 

bingo

 

No such thing as a 'true champion' - he's either the world champion or he isn't. And the fact of the matter - whether rightly or wrongly - he isn't a world champion... Burns is.

 

but that was not the question you numpty was it :bart , it was would you want alot more money second time round , like how you try to bend the question in hand to suit your argument :verysad

 

Okay - no I wouldn't, I would take my chance, not do anything that could scupper the match (like moronically demand more money) and concentrate on winning the bout.

 

yeah khan never lost to peterson as he had the wba belt returned to him
atsch your statement is flawed to anyone who knows anything about boxing

 

yeah you never asked for a payrise :think just get your head down and concentrate on the job in hand what ever

 

We're not talking about Khan - Peterson; we're discussing Beltran - Burns. Deal with the matter, as they say.

 

God, you talk some amount of sh!te - the dynamics of competitive boxing differ ever so slightly from the daily grind of normal working life.

 

qoute winston barry Robberies happen from time to time in boxing; as a precedent that doesn't mean any subsequent fights (or fighters) are obliged for a greater purse.

We're not talking about Khan - Peterson; we're discussing Beltran - Burns. Deal with the matter, as they say.
just when it suits you sir bend sh1t and take it out of context to suit your agenda.
i was fuc king all night last night and am now tired of dealing with ****s:hi:

 

so you would not want more money risking your health but yet you would want more money for doing dolly parton hours atsch

 

I'm talking in generalities - you're talking specifics. Understand the difference? Clearly not.