More impressive Welterweight debut- Broner against Paulie or Pacquiao against Oscar?

Fuxking owned hard:shock:


It's a tight one

 

Pac was the underdog, Broner was the favorite but yet ended up having the harder fight

 

:deal

 

:dealowned:good

 

Steve Forbes broke Oscar's eye-socket...that's just how SHOT he was at WW.:deal

"Oscar can't pull the trigger at 147"...Freddy Roach.

Paulie didn't have IV marks in his arm like Oscar did.

Malinaggi had one of the best camps of his career.
Oscar spent more time losing weight than he did training.

 

This is a silly question, Pac was far more established at that point he was 30 years old and had been fighting at the highest level when he was 26 and fought MAB. Broner is 23 and still finding his groove.

 

This poll is a joke.

 

mayweather ***s were so happy when this fight was called because oscar had lost a sd loss to a peak mayweather, no way he could lose to pac right

147 was fine for oscar, what wasnt fine was the speed

mayweather watched the fight and shat his pants

then told the *****s to eat that **** because it was chocolate gold

*****s still tell you what gold tastes like

 

WHAT THE FU(K does this even mean?

i think some of these tards need a little vacation:nut

 

Pacquiao-DLH was by far a better win regardless of the fact that Oscar was drained as **** for that fight.

 

I'm pretty sure that it is a fact that Broner defeated Paulie via Split Decision.

 

You do realize that the vast majority of people in the media and on ESB alike thought that Broner won the fight against Paulie, right?

You sound like a ranting madman with no credibility... especially when you refer to a fight that the majority scored for the guy who got the win (unlike against Ponce).