strangely excellent bbc article

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by mbrockett, Nov 7, 2013.


  1. mbrockett

    mbrockett ESB voyeur Full Member

    888
    0
    Jun 28, 2008
  2. Mufc30

    Mufc30 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,629
    1
    Jan 28, 2013
    Is Gavin on Wa rrens books? I noticed the comment about his trainer not been after money if Gavin hadnt been paid on time, i know this is a claim levelled at Wa rren but would be interesting if it was another promoter.
     
  3. tofu2009

    tofu2009 Active Member Full Member

    978
    1
    Feb 16, 2011
    Bit of a slip up there from Frankie.
     
  4. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    Ends the discussion on whether that rumour is true or not.
     
  5. Dr. Moneymaker

    Dr. Moneymaker Interim Silver Champion Full Member

    286
    0
    Mar 3, 2013
    The BBC have had quite a few decent boxing articles recently
     
  6. mcguirpa

    mcguirpa Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,957
    106
    Feb 15, 2009
    What waste.

    He should have had double that number by now.
     
  7. Josephd86

    Josephd86 Active Member Full Member

    991
    0
    Jul 2, 2013
    Ben Dirs is a fantastic writer.
     
  8. tofu2009

    tofu2009 Active Member Full Member

    978
    1
    Feb 16, 2011
    Come on lets not get carried away now.
     
  9. 46and0

    46and0 It's irrefutable. Full Member

    7,009
    132
    Dec 6, 2008
    Ben Dirs, despite his silly name, is a really good writer. Knows a lot about the sport.
     
  10. tofu2009

    tofu2009 Active Member Full Member

    978
    1
    Feb 16, 2011
    I think he is a typical mainstream writer in relation to Boxing, has the same narrative as everyone else.
     
  11. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    His writing is very fact based that regurgitates stereotypes or already widely held beliefs. It is symptomatic of any BBC sports writer as they are jack of all trades, masters of none.
     
  12. KermitTheFrog

    KermitTheFrog The people doing the banning are idiots Full Member

    2,056
    2,055
    Sep 5, 2012
    Why is the article strangely excellent?
     
  13. qwert

    qwert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,544
    68
    Dec 22, 2009
    Ben Dirs is good writer, especially on cricket, but his boxing articles always have the tone of a casual fan, or a former fan now jaded with the sport.

    This article was good though. I have some sympathy for Gavin and DeGale, especially for DeGale being booed on his debut and Gavin for his problems outside of the ring. Both have been criminally inactive since turning pro, and you have to hold their promoter responsible for that.

    They've also been mismanaged by the same man IMO. DeGale was being portrayed as such an ass and Gavin's career seemed to be spiraling out of of control. But they also need to take some of the responsibility themselves.

    It sounds like fighters are too coddled under the Team GB setup, which doesn't seem to set them up for the reality of the pros.
     
  14. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,537
    2,357
    Apr 22, 2012
    Degale pretends he's not a ****.... but every so often, you just get a little glimmer of just how much of a **** he is.

    And he is a massive ****.

    Thats why people turned away from him, same with Khan.

    Maybe the English should just calm down on the enormous hype before a fighter has achieved anything in the sport. They just set the fighter up to fall, and they nearly always do.
     
  15. Strongback

    Strongback Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,420
    9
    Nov 6, 2009
    One of Ben Dirs better efforts on boxing. His boxing article are generally populist and lightweight. A boxing fan can generally pick holes in what he says fairly easily.

    As a poster above said he is a jack of all trades and not a boxing specialist.

    In saying all that I think he can write well and his articles have a good flow to them.