The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

What southpaw has Floyd loss to, last I checked Guerrero, Ortiz, Zab, Corley, Mitchell, etc...are all southpaws, how exactly does Floyd have a problem with southpaws when he had beaten every one he's fought?

 

they're C class fighters. How about and A class fighter like Manny. Manny is way better than them combined

 

Exactly. This, in fact, is the mother of all settlements to the 'arguement."

P34c3

 

Cause theyre all bums? Who's the best fighter that any of these 5 bums combined have wins over?.....Andre Berto. Exactly.

And 2 of those bums had floyd rocked.

 

**** you that doesn't count because JMM was on undetectable roids against PAC and he stepped on PAC's foot. Was he on the roids when he fought Floyd? Did he step on Floyd's foot? Okay then...

 

Castillo X2, Canelo, Genaro, Corrales, Marquez

He'd probably lose at least 3 out of those 6.

This whole argument is flawed because he didn't progress through his career and weight classes in the same way/time Floyd did. So the only way you could view it is as the peak from the given weight class pretty much (i.e. David Diaz only sample for Pacquiao at 135).

 

How can you talk about facts with a hypothetical thread?

 

B-B-BUUTTT But but!

People tend to forget #6, Team Pac killed the first deal and then turned around and wanted that same deal when Floyd started calling him out again. By that time it was clear Floyd was Side A and he had every right to demand more.

You could have went on to talk about the second round of Nego's (I mean when Floyd was calling out Manny in every way imaginable but Arum would not pick up the phone and didnt know who to talk to. Floyd had to call Manny Personally to try and talk about the fight. I think Floyd should have not offered a flat rate but rather a %, like 60-40. However, no can deny his effort because Team Pac did ****

 

I never understand these arguments. Pac lost fights that he suppose to have won. Early in his career and later in his career. So saying Pac would have beaten everyone on may weather is a lie. Because history has proved Pac is known to take losses.

 

I said facts to support your argument. Opinions are not facts. And a hypothesis is an educated guess. But you can have facts to make your opinion make sense, or to make it stronger

 

He got slept by someone seemingly on the illegal PEDs?

 

he would lose to canelo maybe an maybe a bigger hoya but no way does he lose to zab Judah or a 154 cotto. he beats cotto the same as he did the first fight cotto couldn't deal with the angles he created an that wouldn't change at 154 were he is still the same fighter just weighs more. an Judah would have started strong an crumbled an get stopped late.

 

Nice post. It'll be ignored, just like the facts of this story are.

 

Did he get defeated, YES or no *******? Geez, you *******s refuse any fact that doesn't color your idol in a favorable light. How good would Pac be without PEDs? He was getting beat by cans early in his career which shows he wasn't naturally gifted.

 

Not any sort of comment on PAC or Floyd but I can think of plenty of considerably worse welterweight belt holders than Baldomir.