Why Has Scotland Never Had a Heavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Nov 9, 2013.


  1. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009

    It's to do with the genetic stock of the working class/poor. England and Wales have a greater history of immigration than Scotland so the working classes of England and Wales have (for want of a more politically correct expression) benefited from waves of out breeding compared to Scotland. You only have to look at the names of the best boxers to know that the Scottish boxers are still ethnically Scottish where as England and Welsh poorer communities are ethnically more multicultural.

    Scotland produces big men but not ones who train from children that grow into heavyweight sized boxers. You tend to find the biggest boxers take to the sport later and its the lifelong boxers that make the best fighters. Often the fighters of the smallest weights have bigger brothers who never took up boxing.

    For some reason other country's produce heavyweights who have trained as boxers all their lives that come from poor backgrounds. Scotland is not one of them.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Since the 1600''s ,7 million Irish have emigrated to the US.
    It was only the immigration of Irish into Scotland that made Scotland sustainable. So huge was the exodus from Scotland to other lands.
     
  3. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Ama and pro are totally different games, and he came back to England to take up a pro career.

    But if its about Celts, and Anglo's fair enough.
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,540
    46,106
    Feb 11, 2005
    The Irish provide the greatest physical breeding stock on this or any planet!

    We are a breed of height, intelligence, good looks, sobriety and are fairly hairless, to boot. It's more a wonder why the entire top ten of every division isn't filled with O'Brien's and O'Shaughnessy's.
     
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    But unlike the Irish that settled in America the Irish that settled in Scottland grew no bigger and bred with as small or smaller people as they left behind in Ireland.

    Who is to say the poorest Irish were genetically any bigger than the poorest Scottish?

    At the end of the day the best fighters are the ones that live closest to the best boxing gyms. If the best boxing gyms are where the smallest people live the best boxers the gym will produce will be small fighters.
     
  6. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    A few points. Ireland like Scotland has had little immigration(until say 10 years ago) so that hits that argument. Also the average height of an Irishman is about 5-8 also. The "big Scots just don't box" seems the kindest answer, either that or they cannot?
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,221
    Feb 15, 2006
    A good question and one to which I do not have a ready answer.
     
  8. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    Yes, it's weird. Farnan, Lees, Slavin, Jackson, Goddard, Fitz, Dooley, O'Donnell, Hall, Doherty, Felix, Squires, Lang, Laing, Creedon to mame just a few off the top of my head and then ...Squat. Some of these guys were middleweights or L/Heavies and some were born outside Australia/ NZ but from that to nothing? incredible!
     
  9. magnus1982

    magnus1982 New Member Full Member

    24
    0
    Aug 2, 2013
    Reading this, i dont think ive ever thought so many ******s could group together and use a PC...

    on about poverty, genetics and breeding stock? Really?

    It's just culture, football only really got as far north as aberdeen until the last 20 years, same as rugby. Up north its all shinty and they're all mental. aberdeen only has 1 football club, hardly any compared to the populated areas further south, that's hardly any per head. yet per head the scots are more fenatical about football than any other nation in europe. attendances outstrip every other nation by population.

    Its just interests and boxing isn't that high on the list.

    Oz has aussie rules as well as cricket and rugby, most other sports suffer. New zealand just has rugby.

    couple that with a lack of boxing gyms outside of glasgow and edinburgh and its no wonder to me theres been hardly any. Gary Cornish is the first in years and he's fighting out of inverness under gilmore struggling to find sparring partners, he does it part time and came to it late yet is still 16 wins from 16. he has loads to learn and heres hoping the commonwealth games sparks something in our nation...

    its purely a lack of interest. Idiots!
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Just so we are clear, its only the smaller men that are interested in boxing then?

    Harrison
    Murray
    Limond
    Watt
    Buchanan
    Lynch
    Calderwood
    McGowan
    Brown
    Simpson
    Burns
    Sutherland
    Weir
    Lee
    Paterson

    We may be ******s, but we can spell FANATICAL.:good
     
  11. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,812
    843
    Jul 25, 2008
    I think there is probably some validity in some points that have been made, specially genetics.
    Most of Scotland's best fighters have been smaller men and that's a fact. Most of the great fighters from Mexico and other South American countries have been from the smaller weights as has Asia.
    America has had more success with big men and England is having more success more recently with big men with immigrant forefathers.
     
  12. magnus1982

    magnus1982 New Member Full Member

    24
    0
    Aug 2, 2013
    Jesus I’m being chastised for making a typo while ranting, please forgive me!

    to state that the Scots as a nation have more poverty than the rest of the UK is completely unfounded and the actual opposite is true. Currently scots have less unemployment and provide more cash per head than any other area of the UK outside London due to the Oil and Gas sector.

    The Scottish health survey in 2008 has the average height in Scotland in men at 1.78m and the English survey in 2010 shows the same at 1.77m.

    if you are wondering why our better fighters have been predominantly smaller, my best guess would be that it is a nation of scrappers. We call it little big man syndrome… little guys picking fights with the biggest guy they can find while drunk. Very common in the cities.

    Back when I played rugby, it was always the little ones you watched out for as they always started everything. Being 6’3” and 18 stone, I would generally be a target. Its just a culture thing. Scottish bigger guys just don’t normally go in for boxing. I never did even though I was always ok at it (fighting I mean) having been beaten up constantly as a kid by older brothers, who are all bigger than me may I add.

    My family are all huge, being from Shetland, you could argue it’s a Scandinavian help but Shetland has been part of Scotland for nearly a thousand years.
     
  13. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    nutrition IS a fact though, and especially in times of extreme poverty (more so past times), which Scotland (and other places), was famous for...

    malnourished people were / are smaller. that and population, and only two major cities to go to or come from diminished numbers even further, and the people you were getting were of the less fortunate ilk, ie small.

    interestingly I was watching QI last night and they spoke of how the Japanese people, genetically & historically small, well their size had grown tremendously in just over a decade or so by the introduction to 'beef' in their diets. so not only is diet a factor among peoples everywhere, but likewise food additives and hormones in the food.

    the same is true in the opposite... WHY are we no longer producing normal size people / HWs, but rather GIANTS, in essence S-HWS?
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006

    No you're being chastised for being ****ing rude.

    Scotland has never produced a heavyweight worth a cup of cold **** ,and that goes back centuries before the oil and gas fields became a factor.
     
  15. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    I don't buy the Scottish are the most fanatical football supporters in Europe line.

    They might be as far as Celtic and Rangers are concerned, but that is all. Where I live there is a bar owned by a Rangers " fanatic " with its own supporters club. The consensus there is " Will there still be an SPL by the time Rangers get back up there?"

    This is apparently due to the fact that the other clubs in the SPL need the visits by both Rangers and Celtic massive followings to stay afloat.

    At the moment they are only getting the Celtic fans visits.