Best of all time - Yes! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9V1wkNKxGs due to the following reasons: never asked drug testing: from an undefeated Hatton from a bigger ODLH requested PED's testing when it came to the smaller Pacquiao :rofl he rejuvenates fighters fighting them at their natural weight but totally fine to request catchweights :nut he really is the best of all time :rofl
Here's the deal on that, Duran's boxing IQ or skill level is no where near Mayweather's, Leonard made him fold with a little razzle dazzle. He couldn't think past the bull****. Duran was a hell of a scrapper, but Floyd is an artist and a master. Duran came up in an hell of an era and he wasn't the best of that era but you can't blame Mayweather for that. What I am saying is this, If Mayweather had of come up in the Duran era, with his boxing IQ and skill, He still would have been an elite ATG fighter. His limit would have been welter because those were big welters and they would be like the 154's are now.
He's the best in ducking opponents, yes. Health comes first, then why are you playing boxe? Go play baseball, ffs!
Floyd's IQ is only high because he fights slightly above average fighters !! He 's never been in the ring with anyone that could really test his IQ .
Floyds IQ Ok, if *****s keep buying my fights keep cherry picking them for meatsch. *****s: Floyd is the GOAT.
It boils down to who you beat? Has Mayweather beaten a middleweight? No, would Mayweather even step into the ring with Hearns, or Hagler, of course not..hell old man ODH gave him all he could handle, never mind Hagler. One thing you can say about Duran, he 100% for sure would have fought Pac had he been active today.
Only for the ***** nuthuggers Somebody who's best win is diego corrales cant even be top 15 It cant be helped, his career has been a cherrypicking parade for the last 10 years after all, but hey his health comes first
No, he isn't. The fact that he never fought the most obvious and significant fighter out there for him will forever disqualify him. And frankly, I don't care who is to blame. They never fought, end of.
No he can never be best of all time! and even if he fought Pacquiao it wouldnt make him best of all time so stop with the Pac nuthugging! I think he will be in top 15, top 10. If u ask me hes the best I ever seen! Im only 27 but theres been nobody close to him that i can think of. Hes the most accurate, top 10 defesive fighter ever, the best reflexes ive ever seen out a fighter, always been one of the fastest. Resume wise theres nothing he can really do to be the best but just beating the best boxing has to ever and never having a close fight says alot. I mean 1 close fight then spanked him in the rematc, says alot. and at 36 just beating a 23 year old which might be one of the greats also say alot