james j jeffries ATG NO!

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by HeavyweightCP, Nov 11, 2013.


  1. HeavyweightCP

    HeavyweightCP Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,424
    62
    Oct 16, 2011
    Been reading up on him.

    i just saw a remastered fight of him vs gus ruhlin.


    The stories of him being able to take a beating and being very strong i would say are true.


    But him being on the greats no.

    I have seen 3 of his fights

    He fought with his hands down slow footwork pawing with his glove.

    imagine a guy walking toward tyson dempsey or foreman or louis even frazier with there hand down.

    they would get koed quickly.

    Ali would would cut him up to ribbons

    I dont think wlad and vitali are great fighters but they would destroy jim.

    Sonny liston would destroy him plus many more.

    Lennox would ko him

    Marciano to
    if he re learned how to fight in another era he could have been great.

    But from what i have seen he is lucky to have fought in the early 1900s
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Can you still be tried for HERESY ?
     
  3. HeavyweightCP

    HeavyweightCP Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,424
    62
    Oct 16, 2011
    jim was overrated
     
  4. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,124
    8,572
    Jul 17, 2009
    He was very good for the times that he fought in. He'd never have beaten Jack Johnson,though, no matter at what stage of his career he'd got in the ring with him.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,059
    Mar 21, 2007
  6. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    He was the best in his own time - what more can one ask for?
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,221
    Feb 15, 2006
    All of the above is totally irrelevant.

    Even if we accept your assumption that he would get destroyed today (never a given), it would not in any way detract from his historical standing as a dominant champion.

    He was clearly the best heavyweight of his era, and quite probably the best that there had been up to that time.

    That by any definition makes him one of the heavyweight greats.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Nothing.
     
  9. HeavyweightCP

    HeavyweightCP Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,424
    62
    Oct 16, 2011
    naw i just do like how racist writers tried to say he could have beat foreman louis marciano jack and ali and frazier
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,221
    Feb 15, 2006
    You can’t simply dismiss anybody who holds a different opinion to you as being racist.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  11. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Works for me!
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Jeffries was percieved as being a top ten ATG at heavy by many writers into the 50's, but as the old guard passed away so did his support .
    In the 50's Dempsey was seen as much better than the new king Marciano, now the majority, [not me,] think Marciano beats him.
    It's a cycle.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  13. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,225
    1,636
    Sep 13, 2006
    Every era has guys who say "The old-timers were way better than the guys today." And others who say, "The guys today would kill the old timers." Could it be that good fighters are good fighters in any era? I think every top fighter, every top era, has strengths and weaknesses. A lot of how these fights play out has more to do with how particular styles, strengths and weaknesses match up, as well as the rules in play and scoring criteria. There are so many factors - fight to finish or limited number of rounds, maximum number of rounds, glove size, referee style, scoring criteria/method, straight Queensberry rules or clean break, smelling salts allowed, fight can or cannot be stopped on cuts, don't stop fight unless count to ten, allow unlimited number of knockdowns, ring size, etc. Makes it harder to translate one era to the next.
     
  14. HeavyweightCP

    HeavyweightCP Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,424
    62
    Oct 16, 2011
    The early 1990s i say was a wild time for boxing. less rules.

    i do not think the heavyweights were great then.

    jack johnson was the best of them all.

    with those size gloves i think foreman or tyson might have killed jim.

    max bear might have to.

    now boxers from the 20-80s are better than the fighters today alot of great technique fighters have stopped using
     
  15. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,427
    8,872
    Oct 8, 2013
    Jeffries is clearly an All time Great. He fought 9 future Hall of famers losing only one of those fights and it was after a 6 year layoff to a fellow all time great. His resume speaks for itself. He also fought and defeated several good to very good black contenders on the way to the title, names like Hank Griffin, Peter Jackson and even Bob Armstrong. Too judge him against anitquated recording equipement and only seconds worth of prime footage is unfair. Against his peers he stands up to any era's top heavyweights.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.