your college calzaghe fanzine carries somewhat less weight than The Ring. Steiglitz would overpower Veit and stop him.
your first example was a lie - Roch didn't vacate to fight Eubank, he went to LHW for four years before returning to SMW. Why did you lie, Bailey? 2nd example -Lacy was favourite to beat joe, so how was joe the man to beat? Lacy didn't vacate the IBF at all 'to face joe', it was a unification. Why did you lie again, Bailey? 3rd example, Kessler gave precedence to the WBA and WBC titles first by unifying them and defending them, and vacated neither to face Calzaghe. Why do you lie again, Bailey? What is your reason for telling so many lies? Its like every point you raised is a lie.
you know what you lied about concerning Rochi, but you don't want to mention him now your lie is exposed. You've gone completely silent concerning him! you cant support two counteractive arguments - either Lacy was the man OR Joe was the man. Either which way you choose, you lose an argument. Clearly you don't want to lose. exactly, he didn't turn his back on the wba or wbc IN THE SLIGHTEST, which is the cornerstone of your original argument -Mikkel fought other champions, made other defences and won two belts from major boxing bodies before choosing Calzaghe. man up and face that fact, Kessler did not go straight for Joe's wbo title, because it was lesser to him. so no more lies to tell -last round, eh? it is for you, son.
Veit wasn't that bad really. He was a decent fighter on the European stage and could have been a titlist if he'd been involved in that shuffling around of the WBC title in the late-1990's/early-2000's, but he wasn't in Beyer or Lucas's league let alone Calzaghe or Ward's. I can only see Ward winning this match up, and it would be an easy UD or stoppage in the mid-rounds.