The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Meaningful - absolutely not. More 'exciting' fights absolutely.

 

Perfect. :good

 

This is a complete no brainer. Fighter of the decade and all that if further proof.

 

acei2g put up a good reply to this so I'll leave adding more detail

 

I thought this was common knowledge, but yes Merchant is right on this.

 

he got fighter of the decade by default. ONLY reasons he got that award (which is laughable he got it) is strictly because he was in some wars and money (PBF) was in a semi retirement, (healin break) and moneys arrogance and ****iness turned lots of the media members and award voters off of him.

floyd was WAY better during the decade and still is way better. always has been always will be. he went undefeated beating every top champ in every division. when has paq fought and beat the top in champ in ANY division outside of the 1st mab fight. considering mab was totally blasted out by a journyman jr jones TWICE previously.

its not even a real debate as to who is was and will always be greater. its a NO contest

 

Its been well documented even by unbiased experts that Floyd just had too many misses.
I know his delusional fans like to think he would beat everyone anyway (and maybe he would have) but that is just not how boxing works, you have to actually fight)

Pacs resume is simply a lot deeper and better as he fought everyone around and sometimes even multiple times.

Floyds resume always remains largely theoretical.

 

This alone shows you are completely ******ed and should be banned.

 

Log off idiot. Floyd resume is very impressive. He came back from retirement and dominated the sport once again. Recaptured title after title and still didn't come close to tasting defeat.

As for pac well we know how his run ended. Hopefully he can have another run after this rios win.

 

How nice of that know hater off pure boxers eh!

 

If you keep avoiding challenges by going inactive while the field thins itself out....
Yes Floyds resume is impressive and he is a ATG but his resume is by no means more impressive than Pacs who fought everyone and every style beneficial or not.

Hell he fought JMM 4 times even though the style match up does not suit him at all.
And i think a little fanboy like you who fills up his post count by sucking off 1 fighter should log off way way way before i do.

 

Raheem, Bradley, JR jones, Chris John = Morales, MAB, JMM daddies. Get over it. They're overhyped. Put them in against guys that stand and trade with them then they are how you see them. Boxing is about skill. Anyone can play shot for shot to the chin. There's an epidemic today where children here in America take turns punching each other in the face to see who gets KO'ed first. This is hardly no different from the fab 4. I don't give a **** what no one says. You're a one trick pony if you can only look good against a certain type of opponent.

 

Pacquiao's opposition:
Brawlers/Punching Bags 95%
Boxers5% in a nutshell

JMM is the closest thing to a technician he's ever fought but he's a clear get hit to hit fighter and has looked horrible against anyone who really does employ boxing against him a la Floyd and Bradley. He's an over rated technician and just so happens to have a ATG chin which is his best attribute. If he didn't have a chin, he would be knocked out cold every fight.

 

Amen GOW7, you know your stuff. roach, even said we cannot fight boxers!

 

Floyd said himself his health was too important for him to fight Pac, this **** so easily goes both ways.
But keep circle jerking each other.

This board has gone to hell quite a long time ago anyway with you rampant fanboys who could not analyse a fight worth anything.