118-110 Scorecard for Pac-Rios? Pure incompetence?

What did you guys think of that scorecard? I've seen shutout fights and could see 1 or 2 rounds going either way, but this fight wasn't that, there was absolutely no rounds you could give to Rios.

I understand it has no effect on the result and does not threaten the result at all, but IMO, it demonstrate incompetence more than anything. If you can't even score rounds that a blind man can score, how can you be trusted in fights that may be closer?

Also I believe judges score a fight round by round, so judges may give the token rounds mid fight when a fighter is already ahead to make it exciting. The reason that is wrong is if for example Pac was up 6 rounds, judge gives a "token" 7th round to Rios despite losing it very clearly, then somehow Rios turns it around and wins the next 5 rounds. We then have a controversial decision, BECAUSE of that token round.

Why is it so hard to just score a round how it should be scored without giving away token rounds?

It's the same **** with other fights, most notably the Canelo-Floyd CJ-Ross score. Such incompetence should result in instant ban, these people are handling peoples careers and millions of dollars, in no other profession would they get away with such incompetence.

 

No idea how you can give 3rd round to Rios, unless you're blind or incredibly bias.

And yes the scorecard is worth complaining about, if a judge gets 2 rounds wrong in rounds they shouldn't be getting wrong because the winner is so clear, then it shows incompetence, and in closer fights, 2 rounds is 2 rounds too many to score incompetently.

 

Did you read my post? It has nothing to do with who won. It makes no difference whether Pac wins by SD or shutout UD, a win is a win. I'm questioning the incompetence of judges not the result. Scoring a round wrong when its clear as day is incompetence, and should not be tolerated.

 

You talk about watching it live, yet none of the ringside viewers have found a round to score for Rios so thats no excuse. It's like the others said, it may only be 1 or 2 rounds here, but 1 or 2 rounds in a close fight is a HUGE deal. It also wouldn't matter if there were 1 or 2 close rounds, but if you can't even score a fight as wide and clear as last night, what hope have you got in scoring a fight like Pac-JMM?

Yes it is subjective, however that doesn't mean free for all. There is still such thing as correct scoring, and 2 rounds to Rios, a 5 year old child could have done a better job.