The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    Are you somehow implying the result would be any different if Mayweather fought the Marquez that put Pacquiao to sleep? :lol:

    And yes, Rios was a tune up and has no business being in the ring with Manny Pacquiao. If you thought that fight wasn't going to play out the way it did, assuming Pacquiao wasn't completely shot, you don't know jack about boxing. He lost to Mike Alvarado at 140 pounds for crying out loud!
     
  2. bobotnaman

    bobotnaman ★★★★☆ Full Member

    3,884
    1
    Sep 8, 2011
    :good another hypothetical win for Floyd. ATG #1. GOAT!!! best of the best!!
     
  3. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    Not giving him any win *******. Just saying what I know will happen. That's why I hope it happens. So it once again shows how idiotic and clueless *******s really are. It has nothing to do with the outcome of the fight, I already know what I will see.

    They don't know **** about boxing, period. That is the only reason why I care about this fight to be honest. To show them how stupid they've been for years.
     
  4. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,881
    34,869
    Jun 23, 2005
    :yep
    I couldn't agree more.

    *******s deep down inside don't want the fight. They know that PBF will outbox Pac to a win. The best thing that could ever happen is for them never to fight so they can keep up this ducking bull**** it gives them something to hold on to and pollute internet forums. Because if they fight PBF will school Pac and they will kill themselves or never come back to boxing forums around the net.
     
  5. demigawd

    demigawd Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,046
    154
    May 1, 2006
    I don't see any of the three as tuneup fights. Rios is a proven commodity. Gurrerro and Ortiz were both, at the time that they fought Floyd, coming off wins against Berto, who was widely regarded for several years as the best welterweight not named Mayweather or Pacquiao. They earned their shots.
     
  6. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    At lightweight.

    How does losing to Mike Alvarado at 140 pounds "earn his shot" against Pacquiao?

    It was a tune up with a guy with limited speed and who had a boxing style that was made to order for Pacquiao.
     
  7. wayne189

    wayne189 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,214
    859
    Jul 8, 2013
    Manny may not of ko anyone in a while but remember he was a flyweight lol. I think his best weight and his power punching were at super feather maximum any higher and hes fighting bigger men and he still won all the way too light middle and he aint even a light welter really
     
  8. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    Pac deserved a light touch coming off of a KO lose . . . there is nothing wrong with that. This guy is the biggest ***** around . . . he talks about Floyd more than Floyd
     
  9. wayne189

    wayne189 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,214
    859
    Jul 8, 2013
    Ped dont give you power just faster recovery from injuries and stamina. Power you either have it or you dont. Manny aint a welter hes a super feather max but his skills means he can beat bigger men
     
  10. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    Agreed. Why some *******s just can't admit Rios was a tune up, I just don't know.

    I'm a Manny fan, and let's be real: Rios has no business in the same ring with a functional Pacquiao. He'd have to be a corpse for Rios to win. If Rios was even competitive I would be calling for Manny to retire.
     
  11. pacman.

    pacman. Member Full Member

    108
    0
    Oct 28, 2013

    And you're basing it on his wins vs who?

    Or don't you believe in all that "levels" bull****....

    Because I thought it was a factor in every single sport out there.
     
  12. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    I'm basing it on what I see them do in the ring. You know, actual boxing ability and physical attributes?

    Idiots like you look at resumes because you don't know jack **** about what you are looking at when you watch them box. So you go to boxrec and try to formulate some ridiculous reason why X fighter would beat Y fighter because of what you see on boxrec.
     
  13. pacman.

    pacman. Member Full Member

    108
    0
    Oct 28, 2013
    So you've made your judgement that I'm an idiot. And that I know nothing of what I see when I watch a boxing match.

    Sort of puts into perspective your "judgement"
     
  14. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    You are the one who mentioned resumes as the basis for your judgement, not me. Yes, that makes you an idiot. And I quote: "Based on his wins vs who?"

    It has nothing to do with a particular win, and everything to do with boxing style, skill, and physical attributes.
     
  15. pacman.

    pacman. Member Full Member

    108
    0
    Oct 28, 2013
    I'm an idiot because I base my judgement on a level of opponent?

    So you judge based on style? So, how does that work? Is it like paper scissors stone; Where one always beats the other?

    Sounds pretty preposterous to me. Sort of ironic that it's you calling other people idiots based on that logic.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.