It's undeniable now... Joe Calzaghe > Froch

....in the same way that George Groves was KOed.


anyway Calzaghe would never have defended against someone of Groves quality at the age of 36. It seems everytime Froch fights now, he is beating Cal's acheivements each time - although last night he did get lucky!

 

Calzaghe had his chance, he didn't want a piece of Froch.
JC is a could have been.

 

Joe Calzaghe is an ATG, Froch isn't even going to the hall of fame

 

Was always undeniable. Joe was clearly the better, more skilled fighter who would win head to head. People mention Froch's Resume but even that is over-rated.

 

where is he ATG. link please. until then butt out.

... thought so.

 

Not a chance. You are a pathetic excuse of a person to suggest such a blasphemy. Joe couldn't hold Carl's jock.

 

after seeing this fight it is clear that joe decisions him 12-0.

 

Calzage is heavy favourite H2H vs Froch but Froch has achieved greater things given his more limited skill set

 

Calzaghe was 35 when he fought a prime Mikkel Kessler - who was easilly more proven at the time than Groves was before he fought Froch, and is a fighter proven to be above the average world level fighter in ability - and 36 when he fought the still elite Bernard Hopkins - and, lets face it, that version of Hopkins, diminished or not, would have easy nights against both Froch and Groves, it'd be as one-sided as his fight with Pavlik - so I think your kind of selling him short because of you obsessive hatred of him.

 

That Polish **** doesn't deserve to have his name mentioned in the same sentence as Calzaghe, never has and never will be in Joe's league. Joe sparks Carl and his 2 ****** brothers at the same time.

 

Calzaghe would of slapped him around the ring at 36.

Ward A+
Calzaghe A
Groves B+
Froch B- (b as surely he boned rachel recently)

 

Lets be fair.

Joe wanted eubank they fight

Froch was after joe, they didnt fight.

Groves was after froch, they fight.

Joe should of fought froch, froch would of recovered

 

That's not fair at all. Eubank was a late replacement for Collins. And Froch was not a big enough name at that point considering the options Calzaghe had.