Does froch lose his 'Warrior' tag if he ducks groves?

Of course not.

 

So a guy that fights how many wars, suddenly doesn't become a warrior because he doesn't rematch someone? You people are a fickle bunch. Froch maybe reckless at times but he isn't stupid. The guy was out-boxed and pummelled by Groves and you all want him to step into the ring again with him? You really are a savage lot aren't you.

 

Seriously? That could have gone either way mate and NOTHING LIKE THE FROCH v GROVES FIGHT!!!

 

well if there was any DEBATE at all about whether he could matched calzaghe groves has ruined that lol.

in my opinion froches legacy has been tarnished.

"that welsh kid, ill knock him out in 3 rounnds"atsch

 

In the Ward, Dirrell and Groves fights we've seen what troubles Froch (speed) and Calzaghe had it in bucket loads. It would have been like watching the Lacy fight all over again.

 

He wouldn't have beaten eubank either

 

Froch is Froch. He isn't some master boxer that'll put on a clinic. He's your no nonsense throwback fighter that hits and gets hit.

 

This.

Joe would've thought that it was his Birthday AND his Christmas if he ever fought Carl! Joe would have likely ended his career.

 

make this post whit out the if's and would'ves
oh **** you cant