He's OK (vastly overrated by some, vastly underrated by others) but he'd get stopped by Wlad anyway so he's not exactly bringing excitement to Heavyweight boxing.
He is included. 1. Wlad 2. Povetkin 3. Pulev 4. Fury 5. Stiverne 6. Thompson 7. Chisora 8. Adamek 9. Perez 10. Cunningham There's a huge gap between #1 und #2 and a pretty big one between #2 and #3 as well I think. Given how good is resume is, I should be more fond of him but I'm not. I think Pulev is mainly getting by on beating guys who are somewhat decent and legit but incapable of exploiting his weaknesses (which were discussed in this thread). I like his jab but I don't see much else in him. A good jab goes a long way of course, especially in a division this bad but I can't say I see anything special in him. He still has plenty of time to prove me wrong, I got no problem with that. A fight against Chisora would be a start. Adamek would've been an interesting fight too had he not bailed out. I want to see him in the ring who is able to get him out of his comfort zone.
He's got a good jab. I don't think he'd ever compete with Wladimir or Vitali, however. I do believe he could pick apart guys from the yesteryear, guys like Peter and Maskaev.
There's currently no real challenger to Wlad, sad as this is. The bleak picture, however, gets more interesting, when we take Wlad out of the equation. I sincerely, when Vitali retires for the WBC to organize a real tournament for the mandatory position. Of course, after giving Steverne his title shot first.
He isn't as good as his resume indicates. Being in front of today's HW scrubs means **** all. English is clearly not your first language I take it?
Well based on resume Haye was always ****, but based on ESB fantasy matchups Haye was an ATG in the marking. So you're saying Pulev is the opposite? Decent resume but won't ever reach much? I think the jury is still out on him. He has good fundamentals, a decent promoter and time is on his side. I think he could win a belt one day and defend it a couple times.
Except Haye's resume wasn't ****. He beat Valuev, Ruiz and Chisora which is EASILY enough to be a top 5 HW these days. That's not even debatable. Also, please don't turn this into a Haye thread. It's COMPLETELY unrelated to him. Haye showed pretty decent skills, fundamentals and sick speed for a HW in his heavyweight outings (alongside glaring weaknesses like lazy workrate, open defence and so forth). There might've been something special in him, turned out there wasn't. Unlike in Haye, I don't even see the potential in Valuev although I agree that the jury's still out.