Why Does Broner Get Watched Under Such A Big Microscope?

This. The main difference between Broner and GGG is that GGG isn't calling himself an all time great, he isn't being brash and braggadocios. To the contrary, GGG speaks of his willingness to fight other top fighters and prove himself, while he dominates his opposition. Broner, on the other hand, has cast himself as a PBF analog while not looking remotely as dominant as Floyd.

 

OP, you were one of the people hyping broner beyond belief. I think you called Maidana a bum. The bubble burst, AB turned out to be a pathetic fraud and now you're crying racism. It's quite comical. Hmm... People don't hate broner because of the constant disrespect of others fighters (even the ones brought in to lose), the unsubstanciated arrogance, the *** tapes, constant self-hyping, talking about being the second mayweather, the childish antics, dry humping dances etc... It's racism. Everyone is racist.... God black people on this forum are ****ing stupid

 

Broner called for the attention! he wanted it! he got it, and now he has to live with it!

 

Because Provodnikov and GGG are real kill or die warriors in the ring and they have NEVER been brutalized and dominated like Broner got brutalized and dominated by Maidana. You're the same who said Provodnikov is overhype, who's the hype now *****?

 

Where's this bitchass?

 

He's ducking harder than German soldiers in the trenches of World War I.

 

Sweet D willy will likely never admit he was wrong about broner, the butthurt must be through the roof

 

There's a cultural difference between american black fighters and fighters from other countries such as Russia, Kazakhstan, etc and the difference is that in other cultures you don't run your mouth and talk **** because you lose respect and it makes you look like an immature idiot. Their culture is based on saying a couple words you really mean and then backing it up in the running instead of running constantly blabbering like these ****y black fighters such as Curtis Stevens and Adrien Broner who are learning the hard way NOT to provoke these fighters who come from third world countries full of REAL poverty and brutal violence, in the case of Golovkin both of his brothers were killed during the war in Chechnya and in the case of Maidana he came from REAL poverty where he literally had NOTHING unlike Broner who grew up relatively priviliged boxing and training in American gyms with good equipment. These foreign fighters got to where they are through hard work, grit and determination and american fans well mostly american black fans on this site dare say that Golovkin is hype? Are you serious? The man is so solid that he hasn't been knocked down or knocked out in over 375 fights, both as a professional and amateur.

 

Not a microscope but Spotlight and he put him self there with his antics. Everything from being a clown releasing his own *** disgusting *** video. He made himself the villain, but unlike Floyd who has the skills to back up what he says, Broner manages to get more ignorant more ghetto and more stupid, it's like he is evolving backwards.

 

Self proclamation can sometimes be very harsh if you fail to live up to what your mouth cashed in advance.

Broner is under the microscope because he placed himself there with his whole shtick.....being disrespectful, overly ****y and trying too hard to be something people dislike can make you a lot of money. Look at Floyd......but you cant lose. Because losing is amplified even if you step up....fight hard and show heart. He made a bed he has to sleep in.

 

if you are a pu**y but acts like a dick, then you deserved to be scrutinized. who knows you might be the missing link between humans and aliens. wtf am i talking about

 

Wouldn't exactly call him a *****......actually I wouldn't call him a ***** for going 12 hard rounds with Marcos. He manned up. Shot his mouth off but he did take the fight.

 

Holy crap what bull****. Black American culture entails insulting your opponents? What a load of crap. Broner has an engaging personality and is perfectly aware how to market himself most efficiently. Boxers don't care whether the spectators wanna see them win or lose, the point is, they pay either way and playing the "bad boy" works out nicely. Nobody wants to see two good guys in the ring. Trash talking has always been part of the game and is sure as **** not an inherent black trait. I'm white and I trash talk the **** out of anyone in any game. It's fun, it arouses emotions and attracts attention which is EXACTLY what you want in a business where 99% of the athletes can barely live from the income they get of off fighting alone. In order to gain the public's attention, trash talking works pretty fine in conjuction with an exciting boxing style.
The fact that you are this shocked by cocky behaviour outside the ring undoubtly proves that you are a casual motherfucker who started watching boxing with the Klitschkos and has never seen boxers go at it outsite the ring. Holy crap, you would've dropped dead from the trash talk Ali, Tyson, Toney, Mayorga and so forth conducted. It's show, it's business and it's usually entertaining as hell when the protagonists are gifted talkers. Being humble is a useless trait in boxing and will result in you fighting nobodies for the rest of your career.

 

Broner acted like a disrespectful douchebag, and the usual suspects on here defended.

If any fighter needed a good old fashion ass whopping, it was him.

 

Broner doesn't have an engaging personality.......he has a manufactured personality that he has created based on what the powers that be expect from him

Adrien is a puppet with his whole shtick......it's not real.....it's phony but he does his best to live up to this persona so networks get ratings based on what people expect to see or hear.

Broner is talented as a boxer but most if his attention comes from what he does outside of the ring. Not what he produces inside the ring.

No one cares about trash talk.....it's expected and amplifies the pre fight build up. Broner isn't a trash talker.....or at least not a very good one. He is disliked based on his antics outside of the squared circle because he's lame, phony and disrespectful.

He could keeo that **** up like Floyd if he were to continue winning because the majority would aways be paying to see him lose for the 1st time......since he lost, his gamble to follow in Floyds footsteps ****ed him because to follow Floyd means you HAVE to win. To lose is a major set back for guys who are universally disliked.