How did Amir Khan stay on his feet against Maidana but Broner couldn't?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, Dec 17, 2013.


  1. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    Was Prescott got to do with this?

    Broner never fought someone the same size as him when he was 20 nor did he fight anyone with the power of Prescott.

    Now he is fighting someone the same size as him in Maidana- when he is 24, just like Khan was. He's getting knocked down and losing to him.

    Very much unlike Khan.

    Khan's chin > Broner's chin

    It's irrefutable :hi:
     
  2. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,545
    2,366
    Apr 22, 2012
    Limond and Gomez hits harder than Maidana...

    It's irrefutable
     
  3. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Didn't Khan win a gold medal, lmao? Now you are an excuse maker, lmao.
     
  4. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    Yep but not while Khan was on ***** St.

    What is Maidana suppose to do to get his arms free you ******? Ref was no where in sight. Rewatch the video in the first post.

    Khan also didn't fake injuries to give him recovery time from being hurt. Just like Broner did after the second knock down (something that Khan didn't experience against Maidana once :yep)

    Khan's chin > Broner's chin

    It's irrefutable :hi:
     
  5. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    And it also says Broner down in rounds 2 and rounds 8.

    In the Khan fight it just says Maidana down in round 1.

    Nothing about Khan being knocked down.

    Khan's chin > Broner's chin

    It's irrefutable

    :hi:
     
  6. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
  7. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    Khan.

    But Khan hasn't spent most of his career fighting men he has a massive size advantage over.

    Let's go with the numbers that matter shall we.

    Who was down twice, fighting the exact same fighter at the exact same age as Khan and lost the fight against Maidana. Broner or Khan :blood?

    Who also, in the fight prior to this couldn't stop Paulie and required an SD to get by Paulie. Broner or Khan? :blood

    Khan's chin > Broner's chin

    It's irrefutable.

    :hi:
     
  8. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,545
    2,366
    Apr 22, 2012
    Are you ******ed. Khan did better against Maidana, no ****? Whose saying he didn't.

    You don't headbutt to get your arms free, if you do then you've fouled. It was Maidanas fault, he handed the biased ref the excuse to pause the fight on a silver platter.

    Khan was way more hurt though, he spent three rounds running with jelly legs.

    Khan hasn't been knocked down by:

    Limond (24% KO :lol:)
    Gomez :lol:
    Prescott:lol:
    Garcia :happy
    Diaz:lol:

    And hurt by:

    Maidana:happy
    Carlos Molina :rofl

    Broner has been Knocked down and hurt by:

    Maidnana (80% KO)





    Thats the actual 'facts'. Khan has the worst chin in the game. Deal with it.
     
  9. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    Khan.

    Put I'm not denying Khan's chin is abysmal. But at least when Khan was fighting Limond he didn't enjoy a massive size advantage over him like Broner did at that stage of his career.

    Here's a question for you- between Broner and Khan, at the age of 24, who went down twice and lost the fight against Marcos Maidana?

    Khan chin > Broner's chin.

    It's irrefutable :hi:
     
  10. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    We gon call you Super Excuses. Allah ooooooooooaaaaaaahkbarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrd!
     
  11. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    Khan didn't have a massive size advantage like Broner did against the likes of Perez, drained to **** while Broner didn't bother to make weight Escobedo, and that ATG Broner won his first world title against Vincente Martin Rodriguez

    Here is a question for you- Khan might have been down a few times, but who was down more in the fight against Maidana at the age of 24- Broner or Khan?

    Khans chin > Broner's chin

    It's irrefutable ****** :hi:
    Khan's chin >
     
  12. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,545
    2,366
    Apr 22, 2012
    Yes he did. He had a big size advantage over both Limond and Gomez. Both floored him.
     
  13. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    Broner showed a hell of a lot of heart when he was trying to get Maidana DQ'd for faking an injury, then didn't man up and face the music in the post fight interview just like Khan has done for each of his losses

    Khan's heart > Broner's heart
    Khan's balls > Broner's balls

    Just like

    Khan's chin > Broner's chin

    It's irrefutable :hi:
     
  14. hoopsman

    hoopsman Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,528
    2,153
    Jul 24, 2005
    Khan was hit by the 140 version of Maidana. Broner got clipped by the 147 version. WW clearly agrees with Marcos more than 140.

    Was that really that hard for some of you ******s to figure out?