:rofl Yeah you would think if they put the same effort into learning about the History and styles of the sport the General might be a better place. :conf
1. yeah of course you don't feel like it, cuz there's nothing to find. FYI "hating" on a fighter and claiming another fighter can beat them isn't the same think you ****ing ****** lmao. 2. i'm exaggerating by 10 lbs? evidence suggests otherwise.. unlike you, i come with facts. http://oi41.tinypic.com/2qi73na.jpg 3. good luck trying to convince the boxing public, doesn't seem to be working out so well does it? 4. exposed and knocked down twice, yet still has a better chin-rep than Khan. u must be infuriated lool. you're too easy.
1. atschatsch:rofl:rofl 2. Still more of a size advantage than Maidana had against Broner :hi: 3. Actually on said thread more people do agree. Now he's not fighting midget's like Rees lets see how well his chin holds up. I'm guessing, being that he went down twice to a man that couldn't knock Khan down throwing haymakers at his chin and had to fake an injury to get out of a fight- not very. 4. Why would I be infuriated. It wasn't a fighter I called the future and compared to Ray Leonard that got outboxed by limited plodder Maidana. Nor was it a fighter that I furiously knob slob over that got knocked down twice by a man that couldn't knock down glass-jawed fraud Amir Khan, Average Alexander or shot to **** Morales. You must be well embarrassed :rofl:rofl
I think Sucks-The-Willy is the one who needs to learn about history and styles of the sport. He said Broner is the new Sugar Ray Leonard atsch:rofl:rofl
1. that's right change the subject ***** that's what happens when u lose debates.. 2. please explain. don't tell me you're illiterate and don't know how to count atsch 3. um no, read thru it, and other than trolls which are probably alts of yours most people disagreed with your thread. same thing happened in El Chicano's thread deal with it. 4. i compared his combination punching to Leonard's, not he himself as a fighter. i've also compared Russells handspeed to Taylor's so what? as far as the future? he very well could be. he's only 24 get back at me in a couple of years clown. but anyway, at the end of the day he still is considered to having the superior chin to Khan's which is what this thread is about. learn to live with it. nice attempt of deflecting the subject tho..
This is a straight up Hans vs Willy street brawl... Glad it nothin to do with me... (my han's an' willy get along just fine)
yea, esb has gotten pretty shitty lately.. you can attribute that with garbage trolls like Super ***. i rarely post here anymore unless it's to clown and abuse **** posters like the TS.
on the real though, i need to get some rest. but if the little ho still wants the D, i'll gladly continue to give it to her.
1. I didn't change the subject. Surely if Broner is in Ray Leonard's league he would be a match for Pacquiao? Please explain the similarities between Broner and Leonard 2. Maidana outweighed Broner on fight night by like 3 pounds if that. That's less than 5. You do the maths. 3. Oh here we go one of those who claims everyone else with the same opinion is an alt . Exposed. Maybe the handful of people who disagreed was alt's of yours? :think 4. HAHAHAHAHAHA. The future!!! Yes. get back to me after Broner's next fight when he's as irrelevant as Berto. It's irrefutable glass jawed hype job Khan stayed on his feet to beat Maidana. When THE FUTURE Adrien Broner (who was the same age as Khan when he BEAT Maidana) couldn't. And Khan dropped Maidana too. Broner couldn't with his Ray Leonard like combinations.
Yep come at me and explain how Broner is the future when he couldn't beat someone who glass jawed Khan did and didn't get knocked down at the same age. And Khan dropped him and probably came close to stopping him in the 1st when Broner couldn't hurt Maidana with his Leonard like combinations (even after the bell)
Having Khan being older than Broner when he faced Maidana, it could have been the case that his punch resistence was more mature hence Broner's chin being at least as solid or even harder. But, they were the same age, and not only Khan got hit WAY more and clearer, but he also had a lowest body mass index, which is very detrimental on the chin. Basically, he was more weight cut, which weakens the punch resistence. While Broner looks bloated, so, yes, it really is the case than Broner's chin is WORSE than Khan's one.
1. u got reading comprehension problems along with your math problems? where in that post that u quoted does it say he's in leonards league? i compared one attribute. nothing else. u really are slow. 2. what is 162 - 156? ****, this is basic math bro :rofl 3. simply read thru these threads on the same subject. ESB has spoken. you're an idiot. http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=495914 http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=495825 4. u have no idea what his future holds no more than i do, i know he's 3 weight champ thats for sure. Broner has the chin Hagler compared to Khans. everyone seems to know it except your dyslexic ass.