Muhammad Ali at his best vs. Wladimir Klitschko at his best, who wins?

I have to much fun educating. Im one of those teachers who like to inspire! :good

 

:rofl

 

Damn dog you know you're a ****** when you get shut down in the general!!!

(Jab and Azzer excluded from the generalization of the general)

 

You poor, poor misguided sod.

Wlad was asked his height on Sky Sports when he came into the studio. Turns out he's 6'5" by his own admission. Ali is 6'3". Wlad's reach is 81". Ali''s is 80".

The only stat physically Wlad dominates in is weight, which against an Ali is useless anyway. Why? Because Ali does not need to come into Wlad like so many have. He won't be there for Wlad to lean on and grab.

Why? Speed, and an excellent understanding of distance and timing. These are things your mind cannot compute. Do you have any idea how easy it is to make up that extra inch or two is, if you're fast and light on your feet as was Ali?
No, you don't. You see numbers and that's all you can understand.

Your observations are so typical of the meathead generation.

 

Post of the thread. Funny thing is all you really need to do is watch them on Youtube and see the difference. Ernie Terrell was 6ft 6" and had an 82" reach which is one inch longer than Wlad and Ali punished him mercilessly. I don't mind someone picking Wlad, but not on size alone, that's a pathetic analysis.

Oh and Elroy, you're a ****ing idiot.

 

Its amazing someone as ******ed as you can string together a sentence... I stopped reading at "Ali had poor reflexes even prime".

Noone believes you've been "studying" anything or anyone.


This is blatant trolling at its best- congrats; you've got the attention you crave...

 

Wow... Now I see it! I was wrong all along... Ali didn't have skill or reflexes, he just had a physical advantage over his bum opponents... He had slowed enough by the FOTC so that Joe "Molasses" Frazier could catch him with slow punches...

 

he forgot to say 'I BRRREAK YUUU'.

 

Ali folded when Holmes dominated him for 10 rounds. No mas. Wlad never quit.

 

the strong desire to discredit wlad's chin is provided by his getting wiped out by bums, old men and journey men, so there is no need for an external bias to be applied, you shouldn't word it like that.

Its based directly on fact.

Yours is the desire to discredit these facts by starting your posts with 'I know there is a strong desire to discredit Wlad'. It is you who discredits him by doing this, and you don't even know you are doing it.

 

is that why slow forman pounded the **** out of ali in zaire when he had ali on the ropes and punched himself out,ali wasnt hard to hit then,oh and by the way little frazier kicked his ass to,how many times has alli lost,how many times has wlad lost,he is way to big,powerfull and the speed would allso bother alli

 

then how come with all his speed and timing,forman was able to hammer ali on the ropes all night long

Wlad was asked his height on Sky Sports when he came into the studio. Turns out he's 6'5" by his own admission. Ali is 6'3". Wlad's reach is 81". Ali''s is 80".

The only stat physically Wlad dominates in is weight, which against an Ali is useless anyway. Why? Because Ali does not need to come into Wlad like so many have. He won't be there for Wlad to lean on and grab.

Why? Speed, and an excellent understanding of distance and timing. These are things your mind cannot compute. Do you have any idea how easy it is to make up that extra inch or two is, if you're fast and light on your feet as was Ali?
No, you don't. You see numbers and that's all you can understand.

Your observations are so typical of the meathead generation.[/quote]

 

then how come forman was able to pound on alli all fight long when he had him on the ropes in zaier

 

the answer should be, 'all you fan boys need something better to do, than to prognosticate endlessly on imposible scenarios".

 

Where exactly am I banned from? And where are you coming up with a ridiculous number like 95%? Source or stop making things up.