No, I think Fury puts on a Rigo style boxing clinic and beat Wlad 120-108 on all 3 scorecards with Wlad averaging 2.34 punches a round.
The truth. Why would Fury risk a loss to Haye but not to Wlad. . Most would argue there is no shame losing to Wlad. Im sure he'd rather have a loss to Wlad on his record than a loss to Haye and he was desperate to get Haye into the ring. The blame on Fury can now be put to bed.
Man this Tyson Fury guy sounds like a beast. This will be yet another fight where Klitschko will be the underdog. It seems he's been the underdog in about 20 fights so far. Has any other champion through history battled through adversary like Klitschko to win against the odds so many times? I don't think so.
Fury would be beaten by Pulev , Perez ,Chisora at the moment and maybe Stiverne i think he must fight someone in the top 10 and then think about Wlad he would be put on his ass like Pianeta round 5-6 ...
I don't know. :think The very best versions of Fury we've seen (Johnson? Chisora?) still probably wouldn't be favored by most over the crappiest-in-years version of Klitshcko that kept Povetkin in a bear-hug all night.
wlad hasn't lost in about 10 years and has even lost only a handful of rounds. he is 61-3 (51 KO's) and yet you think wlad loses to Fury in 4 rounds or less? :rofl:roflatschatsch Tyson has never ever been in the ring with a guy like wlad.... whole new level for Fury:deal Wlad by KO
Fury broke down Wlad mentally when they were in a sauna together and he has a fear of him ever since. Wlad will never fight him. Chisora also broke Wlad down mentally at the press conference and shortly after he pulled out.