The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    Manfred has a baby dick TOO!!! :lol:.
     
  2. Lady Girl

    Lady Girl Kneel Before Zod! Full Member

    31,836
    2,058
    Nov 2, 2013
    So does this mean pu--y boy is going to fight him? LOL
     
  3. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
    45-0
     
  4. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,181
    5,396
    May 22, 2011
    :lol: Yeah, a baby elephant.
     
  5. Lady Girl

    Lady Girl Kneel Before Zod! Full Member

    31,836
    2,058
    Nov 2, 2013
    :lol::rofl you mean 44-1
     
  6. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Is Fat Dan in TR's pocket or what?
     
  7. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Because its still in dispute .
     
  8. twenty1

    twenty1 Final Destruction Full Member

    3,191
    0
    Jun 2, 2007

    I will agree to this.
     
  9. Holy Grail

    Holy Grail Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,055
    52
    Sep 13, 2013
    Why does it matter?

    Why Mayweather had tax issues and evaded IRS for years, nothing was reported until public records were obtained and confirmed his tax owe. Pacquiao's is still in dispute.
     
  10. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Why is it *******s always want to bring Mayweather into a Pacquiao thread?
     
  11. Holy Grail

    Holy Grail Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,055
    52
    Sep 13, 2013
    I'm using your idol's past IRS history example to make it understandable for you.
     
  12. MonkeyEarMuffs

    MonkeyEarMuffs Dynamite Upper! Full Member

    593
    4
    Nov 14, 2009
    Yeah, 'cept Pac's money issues are kinda a known quantity among members of the fancy. That guy had painfully obvious money issues to everyone except the most ignorant/self diluted. It was no surprise to anyone who has any level of boxing knowledge. Hell, Roach would just let it slip willy nilly, like Pac's financial status was public knowledge.

    People can say what they want, but Pac's and Floyd's IRS problems are in totally different leagues...Floyd isn't hurting for money, and most likely, never will be. Pac is in serious caca-doo-doo. That cat has some serious money woes.
     
  13. yingyang

    yingyang Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    0
    Sep 21, 2010
    45-0 and avoided 1 at all cost. :hi:
     
  14. MonkeyEarMuffs

    MonkeyEarMuffs Dynamite Upper! Full Member

    593
    4
    Nov 14, 2009
    Fighters aren't afraid of each other. Quit spreading bullsh*t information. It has been, is, and always will be about money. You can call Floyd greedy, stingy, jealous, crafty, tricky, any of those words are fine, but scared, running, ducking, get the f*ck real. It's not even a matter of who wins or loses. If you spend your time fooling yourself into believing either of these guys is afraid of the other, you're a f*cking idiot. It's about money, and who's pocket that money goes into. Plain and simple. Floyd wants most of it, and whatever is left goes to whomever wants it, as long as his name isn't Bob Arum. Those are the stipulations. If you want the 40 million, or whatever the hell ridiculous number Floyd is throwing around that day, then you know what to do. As much as we hate it, it's a sweepstakes, and Floyd is deciding who wins and who loses. But a 10-50 million dollar payment for a loss is only a loss to the most uninitiated... If Pac had any common sense he would have taken that 40 million dollars and his chances and ran with it.
     
  15. StreetDough

    StreetDough Member Full Member

    218
    2
    Aug 31, 2011
    lol funny picture, with even funnier reactions.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.