Muhammad Ali at his best vs. Wladimir Klitschko at his best, who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Canibus81, Apr 3, 2012.


  1. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Guys, Elroy is an alt, and you know whose alt he is.

    WTf are you even entertaining the clown? Wlad was ko'd 3 times in his prime and dropped numerous times by ordinary guys as a champion. Stop wasting your time arguing with a true clown.

    He has no ammo to utter that Wlad is greater than Ali or even half the fighter Ali was.

    Wlad's Frazier fight was with Brewster, and look how he epically failed...talking about he was poisoned, lmao.
     
  2. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,750
    3,946
    Jun 13, 2012
    How could Wlad have "barely gotten hit" in the first fight if he got floored? Hyperclycaemia or not, he still went down from punches.
     
  3. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    You are an alt, an excuse maker, and I don't like alts like you clown. I don't talk boxing with garbage posters like you. The above you can either flush down the toilet, and shove it up your ass. That wasn't a real reply. You retaliated because you have no real answers when it comes down to Wlad and Ali. Convoluted ass, pathetic ass response, lmao.:lol:
     
  4. VivaNazVegas

    VivaNazVegas Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Sep 16, 2011
    I have come to the realization that you're a troll as well because you ignore my attempts to help you deal with the other troll.
    My guess is that you're Elroy's alt.
    In essence, you're arguing with yourself to get more anger thrown around this thread.
    I hope other people realize this and choose to ignore both your profiles until you get yourself banned.
    Don't feed the troll(s) people
     
  5. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Wlad will never be seen as better than Ali or rank higher than Ali no matter the bias, agenda, excuse...or whatever. It's not Wlad's fault. Wlad can only fight who is in front of him.
     
  6. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    My last response to you. I won't let you bail yourself out with lies and deception. Foh...!


    Excuses, excuses. No, Wlad didn't beat Brewster to a pulp liar. Brewster took Wlad's best, went down, got up and finished the fight. Wlad punched himself out. Fighters who take punishment and win deserve credit when it's due. :hi:
     
  7. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    This clown has been drinking too much egg nog, lmmfao.:lol:
     
  8. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    He rematched Brewster 3 years later and we never even got Sanders II.

    Just stfu already, lmao...!
     
  9. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    BB, the mans a goon, funny for a while but now boring - ignore him and he will go away.
     
  10. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,750
    3,946
    Jun 13, 2012
    You tell everyone else to ignore him, yet you keep responding to him as well.
     
  11. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Then call me a hypocrite. You want to finish up, then go right ahead.
     
  12. VivaNazVegas

    VivaNazVegas Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Sep 16, 2011
    No, that was me
     
  13. Is that why Wlad destroyed him in the rematch ******? And what are you implying by saying 'excuses?' That's more than a valid excuse for failing to perform at optimum levels in a bout. This thread is about who would win at their BEST! You can't use the first Brewster fight as a point of reference because Wlad was physically below par on that given night. It's a moot point to make by desperate posters who suffer from blind fanaticism for their idols from an era they perceive to be superior to all others not based on the competitive levels, but on the over glorification of the media covering these bouts. Any era could have been considered a 'golden era' based on how the media chose to depict it. I bet you in Europe people (aside from sycophantic race traitors) in their own perspective view this as the hallmark era of heavyweight pugilism. Do you want to know why? Because these things are subjective. I could give you fighters today that would turn people like Norton, or Frazier into fish food based alone on the size disparity between the competitors of today, and yesteryear.

    Now putting all these points aside, low and behold one of the premier examples of invisible heavyweight superiority of the 1970's touted by the 'boxing purists' on this site.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTKDDTI36yE


    You boxing purists fanatic devotion to these fighters regardless of any facts given to refute your uneducated standpoints is a cancer to the fan base of this sport. Keep watching old black and white tapes of the fighters of past thinking you are some sort of enlightened scholar of the sport that knows more than the other various fans who choose contemporary fighters to beat the mystified fighters of the past several decades.
     
  14. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    197
    Oct 11, 2010
    Styles make fights. Holmes outboxed Ali and made him quit. Prime Wlad would absolutely demolish him.
     
  15. VivaNazVegas

    VivaNazVegas Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Sep 16, 2011
    You don't really believe that