Pac/Bradley: what was the judges motive?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HeavyPuncha, Dec 27, 2013.


  1. HeavyPuncha

    HeavyPuncha Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,805
    15
    May 20, 2012
    For giving the decision to Tim when clearly Pac was winning the fight?

    1) Pac pissing the judges by watching the Celtics game and letting them wait for him until he's done?
    2) Pac being Asian and in the number 1 P4P in years?
    3) Oscar/Floyd bribing the judges?
    4) Judges are blind
     
  2. ValentinePrince

    ValentinePrince Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    32
    Nov 21, 2013
    I'm not sure if there's some all encompassing systemic explanation, I just think in matters involving subjective human judgement from time to time you're going to get these extreme outliers.
     
  3. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    5) The judges scored the fight they saw
     
  4. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    This.

    I think what they saw was that most of Pac's punches that had the crowd going ohh and ahh weren't landing. So they gave him credit for his defense, which was impressive at times.

    But if their was some conspiracy, the scorecards would've been very inconsistent. But that wasn't the case.
     
  5. rtm32

    rtm32 Member Full Member

    192
    0
    Jun 9, 2012
    6) bob arum doing what he has been known to do

    he had to make bradley his new money fighter seeing as pac is out the door
     
  6. Mr Pibb

    Mr Pibb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,529
    19
    Jul 24, 2013
    :happy

    Even Brian Kenny's nuthugging arse had Bradley winning.
     
  7. Mr Pibb

    Mr Pibb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,529
    19
    Jul 24, 2013
    :lol:

    How the FU.CK is Bradley going to be his new money fighter?

    Huh dummy??

    His mother barely knows who he is.
     
  8. texboxing00

    texboxing00 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,152
    18
    Jul 16, 2010
    close fight, I feel Pac won but was close.
     
  9. shenmue

    shenmue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,524
    2
    Nov 12, 2010
    Same here, 7-5 to Pacman is how i scored it (i can see 6-6 or 7-5 Bradley as well). It was much closer than a lot have said it was. I've seen 119-110 type scorecards in Pacmans favor and i feel they are too wide.

    Pacman just didn't throw enough in the first 2 mins of a lot of the rounds and Bradley was more busy and landed more than most remember.
     
  10. Bald_Toad

    Bald_Toad Ring Title Full Member

    5,200
    5
    Aug 4, 2011
    bob paid the judges off. it created another fighter in his stable that he could market and build cards around. pacquiao already has a loss, nobody cares. that's why bob paid the judges off back when mayweather lost to castillo, to keep the 0.
     
  11. HeavyPuncha

    HeavyPuncha Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,805
    15
    May 20, 2012
    almost 98% of the press scored it for Pac how was it close?
     
  12. ValentinePrince

    ValentinePrince Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    32
    Nov 21, 2013
    Even? Lol. Kenny was just about the only pundit scoring it for Bradley whose opinion is touching upon the fringes of validity.
     
  13. Meazy-E

    Meazy-E Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    20
    Aug 8, 2012
    I had it 7-5 pacquiao with some close rounds and I would not argue if somebody had it in favor of bradley. Originally I had it like 11-1 pacquiao and honestly jim lampleys commentary was a huge factor. He was calling out everything PAC threw as if hit hit right on the money when in reality most were grazing blows.
     
  14. ValentinePrince

    ValentinePrince Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    32
    Nov 21, 2013
    Stop with this nonsense. Pacquiao landed the cleaner more effective blows in virtually every round. Even Bradley thought he lost.
     
  15. Meazy-E

    Meazy-E Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    20
    Aug 8, 2012
    Watch it again