Yet another GGG hate thread. How any objective fan could NOT pick gennady's resume is unreasonable. While GGG's ledger is still wanting, not his fault though, Quillen's is pure ****. GGG has beaten 3 top 10 RING magazine middleweights, Quillen 1 and that guy never did anything before and nothing since plus quillen lost every round he didn't get a knock down in. Quillen's a weak fighter with a weak and protected resume, while GGG has a lacking ledger because everyone in his division is scared sh-tless of him. Quillen went to a network with 0 top middleweights because his promoter knew he'd get smashed up if he fought a top guy. Now, you just learned something about boxing TS.
Quillin by far Hassan N'Dam N'Jikam, Winky Wright and Fernando Guerrero are way better than anything ggg have fought. Whos GGG have fought?? stevens?? please *****aaaa
Wright, N'Dam and Guerrero are good wins I dont understand why fans have to defend their fighters even when they are wrong, Stevens and Macklin arent good wins
IMHO yes they are and I'm not a fanboy of either fighter. Both current top ten rated middleweights. N'dan is a good win for Quillin and Guerrero not a bad one but Winky? Guy was 40 years old hadn't won a fight in nearly 6 years and hadn't fought at all in 3 years. To call that one a good win is to endorse grave robbing
[QUOTE="TKO";15913552]IMHO yes they are and I'm not a fanboy of either fighter. Both current top ten rated middleweights. N'dan is a good win for Quillin and Guerrero not a bad one but Winky? Guy was 40 years old hadn't won a fight in nearly 6 years and hadn't fought at all in 3 years. To call that one a good win is to endorse grave robbing [/QUOTE] Wright would school Macklin and Proksa even now Plus Golovkin hasnt got any big wins at all