Pac/Bradley: what was the judges motive?

One judge said,'the old PAC would have took Bradley out'. Because he couldn't do it I scored it for Bradley .

 

Some of you are dumb as mother ****ers.

Don't you remember the lead up of the fight where Pacquaio was sayin he wasn't down with two dudes, bangin eachother in the ass.

The GAY AGENDA shot him down.

70% of Americans are down with that gay ****.

Ask yourself...ARE YOU?

 

Because i thought it was close?, i'm allowed to have my own opinion.

 

I was just thinking the other day how pissed off I was when we had to wait like a ****ing hour for Pac to finally come out; and then i thought, maybe that is why 2 judges gave Bradley the fight. If it wasn't for that they must have been paid off. But then again, it's Bradley who no one gives a **** about, so how could anyone possibly benefit from Bradley "winning?" I guess my final answer should be.....who the **** knows?

 

Not when dealing with the pacquiao meat riders you're not, Pac was rarely able to land that straight left, and if i scored it again I might have it for Bradley or a draw this time around.

They will never admit it was a close fight, They all probably had it 12-0 for Pac.

 

the same judge that saw Canelo vs Floyd a draw? :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl *****s.

 

Bob Arum, Pac vs Bradley II is gonna happen when it shouldnt, who else would Pac fight

 

Pac won the fight but it was close. No complaints from me but I agree it was probably so they could profit from a rematch.

 

either arum was just trying to timmy a bigger draw because if he lost to pac he would prolly never be ppv bound. but with the win vs pac now he has ppv interest. if he didnt win the pac fight he wouldnt of gotten the jmm fight n eve if he did get the jmm then it might not have been ppv. only ppv because of jmm and not bradley , even tho this ppv event was mostly already made by jmm sense he ko'd pacs ass... so thanks to pac these guys can sell ppvs.. but jmm has been on ppv with out manny or floyd vs baby bull diaz as well so hes capable of headlining ppvs now n then

 

Arum/top rank/others wanted to set a rematch and also the fact that pacquiao's contract with them was ending. They were promoting the rematch before the first fight even had happened.

The fight was rescored by new judges after the controversy and all were in favor of pacquiao (im typing from my phone so look it up on wiki pacquiao/bradley). It was one of the most clear robberies in the history of the sport. Most knowledgeable fans would agree (juantards and black supremacists don't count)

 

Exactly what I think too. I don't see any other reason.

 

Galileo said the earth revolved around the sun, what were the numbers then, 100K (population unknown) to 1? He was put on trial for being objective.

 

People say you're likely to get robbed in Germany, but you're just as likely to get robbed in America. Sturm vs De la Hoya, Cloud vs Campillo, Lara vs Williams, Lewis vs Holyfield, etc.

 

also as far as bob is concerned manny will always be a draw even if he loses .an if bradley loses his 0 then he might lose sum interest from the viewers

 

JMM beat Manny in the 3rd fight, and the 2nd one was debatable. Manny got both decisions. Maybe they were trying to even that out with him?

Or maybe they just did not know what they were doing.