The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    So that's the excuse for the Ls Morales was past it when they had that first fight and a 39 year old JMM flat lined him, not the stuff of legend.
     
  2. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
    Why did he fight those guys multiple times? because he either lost or failed to do it convincingly. He didnt do it out of the goodness of his heart.

    Floyd has 1 rematch. 1 that he had to clear up. Pac has multiple because he failed to get the job done the first and second times around.
     
  3. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    I forgot about Pauile but I remeber him fighting somebody like Lazcano and got worked for half the fight. that says alot.

    Mosley was a good win for Mayweather becasue everybody said he was ducking Mosley when he fought Marquez instead of the WW champ in Mosley. Good win for Mayweather and his resume, not a good for Mosley because he had nothing left. doesnt matter if it was 18 months, Mosley was the Champ! and is last fight was against the so called unstoppable monster in Margarito. better win for Mayweather, not even close.

    Weight or whatever whatever, Mayweather won 12 rounds to none. if they fought now Mayweather would win 12 rounds to nonee again. U tell me why Marquez didnt want a rematch with Mayweather but did with pacquaio?? because its a way easier fight because Pacquiao is way easier to hit and Mayweather isnt.

    Yes Pac beat Cotto and also did Mayweather. Pac did better but if u were to ask him or fought a better Cotto then I would say Mayweather. IMO, but there's alot of people that agree.

    im not taking anything away from Pac's wins but Mayweather fought the better opoonet in all situations
     
  4. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    it matters little your opinion, Pac is a first ballot hall of famer, pac is the only ever 8 division world champ no else has come close to that.

    Pac started his pro career at 106lbs and has really beaten up some big names at welterweight.

    And also Pac is rated higher by anybody that matters.

    Facts bro !!
     
  5. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    when u have to fight somebody that many times is because theres losses and not clear wins.

    Mayweather has only had 1 close fight his whole carerr and gave immeadiate rematch, that says alot.
     
  6. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    castillo is not in the mab, em and jmm level.
     
  7. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009

    Yes Mayweather will always be a bad match for Martquez because hsi style has little chance against mayweather, nothing more nothing less. But dont ignore the weight "whatever whatever"- thats a vaid reason to call off a fight and in this case a valid reason to pay six hundred thousand dollars. Thats a lot of money.

    Marquez would fight anybody and would fight floyd tomorrow.

    Marquez is also a bad style for the Pac man yet yet fought him again and again and again and again- that is too his credit !

    How the hell is Cotto a "better Cotto" ? Because Floyd says so ?

    When Cotto went into the ring with floyd he had 2 bad bad beat downs and tkos in his career.

    Pac beat the brakes off cotto.
     
  8. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    Do a little research you may not like what you find. :smooch
     
  9. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    hows your poll doing ?
     
  10. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    Everyone knows that Arum does not want the fight. As you stated May owns May 5 but Bob locks down a month earlier and does not even whisper Floyds name. Instead unkie Bob is looking at Timbo 7 and JMM 99 . . . how can someone duck someone when he is not being pursued?
     
  11. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    I rate those guys higher but Mayweather took that fight in his first fight at the weight! didnt need no tune up, went for the straight champ at 135. and i aslo thought Mayweather won the fight but it was close and gave a rematch.

    Just cause MAB and Morales is rated higher doesnt mean he can he can just lose to them and its fine. there all HOFmers. and like I said Marquez lost to Mayweather 12 rounds to none and even as a full WW now he doesnt ever think about fighting Mayweather again?? Why?? because Mayweather is too damn good but he wanted to fight Pacquiao 4 times, that says something
     
  12. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
    Lol I could put up

    "Who has the better Win/Loss percentage between Pac and Floyd" and on this site Pac would still win. LMAOO. its cool though. I support both, Im just not blind.
     
  13. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    That is correct they put 2 Ls and a draw on Pac.
     
  14. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
    :lol:
     
  15. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    nobody is doubting the titles bro, OF COURSE HES A FIRST BALLOT HOF. Were trying to see whos ranked higher. 8 weight classes says alot. 5 weight classes and as of right now lineal champ in 2 weight classes at the same time says alot too. add no losses and superior boxing skill, I rank Mayweather higher.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.