Golovkin or Quillin? Who has the best resume?

Honestly Stevens would whoop the crap out of Hassan or Guerrero. So would Macklin. Proksa on about same level.

Winky was long since shot to ****. Hadnt fought in 3 years, last 2 fights were losses, was over 40. This is often put forth as Quillin best accomplishment.

I have nothing against Quillan though, I like him and think he is a good fighter. But he shouldnt call out GGG in one sentence, then say the fight cant be made in the next.

 

Both lack, need to unify or lose respect...

 

You have just pwned yourself as that is far better than whats on Quillins or Golovkins resume .
You can also add longevity to Sturm also :smooch

 

Both resumes are paper thin. Golovkin's win over Macklin might be the best scalp among the two with Hassan a pretty close 2nd. Really not that much between them.

 

For all the hype, he does have a soft resume

 

Proksa alone is a better win than shot Winky, NJikam and Guerrero combined.

 

He does, but as I said before, his hype is coming from how dominant he has looked against the competition he has faced. Quillin would no doubt be getting hyped to heavens as well if he looked equally as dominant, instead of going life and death with similar level (or in Rosado's case, common) opponents.

 

It must be added that Golovkin has no way to actually confirm that he deserves the hype, since all the top middleweights have been ducking him for years and show no interest in fighting him.

Martinez, Sturm, Quillin and Murray need to grow a pair of balls and fight Golovkin.

 

Your attempts to insult me are as weak as your english. It's my third language, stop slacking and stay in school :deal

 

I think N'Jikam could well be considered the best win among both men's victory but then again, Quillin looked like **** in that one.

Also, Proksa is really bad. Like, really really bad.

 

:rofl make up your mind. and obviously you didn't watch both their fights with Rosado, the common name on their resumes to make the best judgment with.

 

Their resumes are about even. Neither has fought anyone worth mentioning. GGG's resume is about where Calzaghe's was prior to his meeting an old Bernard Hopkins.
Neither guy deserves any "Super" anything in their title, Yet.

 

atsch How do you think Golovkins record is near to Calzaghes before he fought Hopkins? That makes every current SMWs resume look terrible.
Calzaghe had beaten Eubank, Reid, Woodhall, Veit, Brewer, Mitchell, Lacy, Kessler who had all held a SMW world title and beat many other top 10 SMWs as well as prime Bika who when past best went on to win a world title.
Terrible troll post atsch

 

I usually like to let the hyped fighter prove something first, but I believe GGG is the real deal, whereas Quillin hasn't proven anything, and he was thoroughly exposed against Rosado.

 

I agree.