Joe Louis Vs. Wladimir Klitschko

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Anthony Birts, Dec 23, 2013.


  1. Mr Pibb

    Mr Pibb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,529
    19
    Jul 24, 2013
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  2. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Joe Louis is one of my favorite fighters ever. I've watched most of his tapes.

    He was absolutely brilliant, specifically his timing above all else.

    I just love how most Grabimir hardcores are saying Joe Louis had a weak chin, when Dr. Grabimir himself has an even worse chin and enters the ring in panic mode. Joe Louis was a natural fighter unlike Grabimir.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  3. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    Parrying shots was much more common than slipping or blocking them in Louis’ day, especially among heavyweights. Part of the difference lies in the evolution of the boxing gloves. In their time, gloves were much lighter (4-6oz - the size of a modern MMA glove), more flexible and didn’t have tie tabs to force a closed fist. The smaller, less padded gloves were inferior shields than their modern counterparts, so blocking was less effective. Like many fighters, Louis liked to keep outstretched in order to more easily intercept blows and more quickly land his own jab. The downside of such a stance is that a large hole is created in one’s guard. Louis’ jab was fairly slow and often weak, used more as a set-up than an authoritative punch. It retracted slowly and seldom went back to his chin. This would not work against someone like Wlad who has massive size and reach advantage coupled with devastating punching power.
     
  4. Mr Pibb

    Mr Pibb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,529
    19
    Jul 24, 2013
    Dr Velcro hammer's even said he was faster than Joe:nut

    The difference between the 6'5 + guys of today is that they lack stanima and ability to take punishment.

    Primo Carnera .....unlike Vlad .....MOVED FOREWARD and fired NON-STOP.
    He got off the canvas and continued fighting.

    So did Jess Wilard and Louis Firpo.
    Those giants of yesteryear were a LOT tougher than today's fragile robots.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  5. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    Not a bad analysis...but the only thing is that Wlad doesn't counter. If an opponent throw punches, Wlad back off or holds.

    Oh yeah, I'm still waiting for a reply to my previous question...have you ever picked against Wlad?
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  6. Mr Pibb

    Mr Pibb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,529
    19
    Jul 24, 2013
    Now you're just playing dumb.
    Fighters in Joe's era didn't just parry they SLIPPED as well.
    Vlad can't slip or parry.

    Joe's jab was not slow and it sure as hell wasn't weak.

    Vlad drops his slow-motion jab to his waist ALL THE TIME...what about that:think

    Vlad keeps his feet too far apart which drastically limits his defensive options.

    Plus

    He can't move foreward:deal

    If he finds himself behind in a fight there is no way he can get back in the lead because HE WON'T MOVE FOREWARD.

    Size means nothing...Primo Carnera had size...plus he was BRAVER and actually moved foreward.That didn't help him nor would it help the fragile Ukranian.

    No way does Vlad's fragile as.s get off the canvas as much as Primo did.

    It took TWO Klitchko's to beat ONE Chris Byrd:rofl
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  7. Mr Pibb

    Mr Pibb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,529
    19
    Jul 24, 2013
    did you read the part where he said Joe's jab was slow and weak:nut
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  8. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Name five heavyweights with a better straight right than Wlad. The combination of speed, power, range, straightness, and accuracy he has with it is unparalleled.
     
  9. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Prime Brewster would decapitate Louis. Absolute mismatch. Unfair comparison to Louis really, comparing him to a top 3 HW from 80 years into the future.

    Mayweather would get clowned by an ATG level MW in 2113. Just like Ali would get absolutely destroyed by the leading HW of the 2060s.
     
  10. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Yes, Louis' era was stacked his high quality opposition :rofl

    Here are two guys Louis fought and believe it or not the nutheads in this bring up Galento and Baer as 'skilled fighters' and 'dangerous punchers' -- yet in the 30s this fight was referrred to as the 'battle of the bums':

    [yt]i2DWswsfpmI[/yt]

    You see how well they're SLIPPING punches? Oh and the PARRY! Louis had to dig deep to beat these highly skilled guys :rofl
     
    moneytheman12 likes this.
  11. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,324
    24,044
    Jul 21, 2012
    Wlad began his title regain and won his major belt against Chris Byrd.

    Byrd was the same size as Louis but worse than him in every single department.

    If its unfair for Louis to fight Wlad what does that say about Byrd who was the same size?
    I guess Wlads whole career is a sham so yeah?

    Today in Kiltscko la la land. Its 'unfair' to fight Louis but Byrd is good enough to beat to become champion:rofl

    Keep posting. You make Klitschko fans look more stupid by the day.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  12. thesnowman22

    thesnowman22 Member Full Member

    432
    69
    Dec 29, 2013
    Louis jab weak and slow? omg that's nuts.
    Look, Louis did get knocked down some, but was always back up quickly. He was susceptible to flash knockdowns, but was really only hurt a few times, like Schmeling I when he took a barrage of shots and was knocked out by an accumulation of punches, and yes, many were fired back over his jab, a problem he worked to correct afterwards. That loss was probably actually a blessing to his total career.

    Yes, Wlad is still fighting well now, but I was under the impression that we were discussing the two in their prime. Also, Wlads more pro fights came over many years. Louis was much more active in his prime.

    Louis basically lost one fight in his prime, and he avenged it with one of the most dominating performances in HW history.

    And again, unlike other wt divisions, there is no upper limit on HW, so if born today Louis may be 6'3, 230. Plus, honestly, much of wlads success in later years is attributable to modern training and diet. Not even gonna mention steroids, ok I am, Wlad may not be on them, but look at all these amazing athletes performing at old ages who are now known to have used. Back in the 40s you just weren't as good at 35-38 as you can be today.

    Louis wins this fight 67% of the time. 2 of 3.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  13. thesnowman22

    thesnowman22 Member Full Member

    432
    69
    Dec 29, 2013
    Plus, if you go back and watch ANY film, it seems to me Louis is far more capable of getting inside on Wlad and destroying him. He would slip the jab, bam, hook, bam, get out. Brutal.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  14. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,693
    Mar 18, 2012
    What was louis like 6'1 190lbs? He couldn't hang with a modern LHW much less wladmir. 90% of joe's resume were 165lb 5'9 bum midgets.
     
    moneytheman12 likes this.
  15. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    :rofl:rofl:rofl Yes these classic "giants" we so tough and skilled it hurts! The truth is Carnera had a fragile glass chin that is on par with Wilders.

    Just look at the skill and poise of these guys, then tell me what Wlad would do to these guys who would barely make it to club fighting level today:

    [yt]gk-7ic9OCKY[/yt]

    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
    moneytheman12 likes this.