Sure but that doesn't make the belt illegit? I mean Gatti was probably worse at 140, but nobody is saying Floyd has no belts at 140. By that token Guerrero is a 0 division titlist. Also remember Diaz stopped Santa Cruz, who then went on to humiliate lineal champ Casa in robbery of the century
Ok. So the belt was a legit belt just the way it was setup by the WBC was shady. If what you say is true, I can't say I disagree. Sounds like there was some playing fast and loose with the rankings. Although it happens a lot with committees deciding rankings and not a hard-set criteria for rankings. The committees do strange stuff all the time bumping people up the list for politics rather than merit. Who knows what happened behind the scenes. I still give PAC-man credit for it.
The belt is legit but its the kind on nonsense that allows fighters to claim to be multi-division champions when in reality if they had to face the lineal champ in the division they would not be or in a more likely scenario would stay in the same division longer.
I get that. Still it was a perfectly legit ABC belt he won at that weight. Look at Cotto: vacant belts vs Pinto, Quintana, Jennings, plus beating weak champ with one good leg. You wouldn't say he's a 0 division champ. Many belts weaker than Pac's 135. Diaz was legit top 5 at 135, and probably no worse than the shot lineal champ Casamayor
It can be argued either way I agree which is why you can make a legit argument for Pac being a 8 division champion but also allow guys like rtm32 to troll and make threads like this.
Don't be. After MUCH explaining he realized he was painted in the corner and refuses to answer any questions. Chances are this alt is going on a lengthy vacation or into retirement. Watch another of his alts make a thread like this in a couple of weeks
Going nowhere. I have still yet to proven wrong. It's just no getting to you so its pointless. so I ended it
Oh you were proven wrong alright. Remember, Sergio was lineal without carrying an ABC belt. Remember, lineal belts don't go vacant on ABC strippage. Remember, no other 8 division titlists, fringe titles included. You were dead wrong on every point you tried to make. It's just pathetic that you won't acknowledge it, makes you look extremely dense, even more than you probably are.
I was right with all my points which was just 2, that there are plenty of people with 8+ titles and that if the title isnt WBC,WBA, IBF, or WBO its doesnt matter. Nowhere was i proven wrong with those points
You are the pathetic sounding one. refuse to answer anything i said and just qualify all your statements
Who cares about 8+ belts, we're talking 8 titles in different divisions. See thread title, as I told you multiple times you fcuking moron. So to you Sergio was not the MW champ, I got that. Shows what your rankings are worth, **** for brains.