What was the biggest robbery of 2013?

If you go back to my original post on this thread I gave Burns-Beltran 2nd place, at best Burns won 3-4 rounds but at least he didn't win.

 

you think Broner won 3 rounds?

Which ones?

 

Broner won 4 rounds, 5 rounds tops after the 5th against Paulie when he tired.

Can't remember which one's exactly. But it wasn't enough to win the fight. Even without the points deductions.

 

The only two that posted scorecards on the RBR, IntentionalButt and PinoyProdigy has it wide for Broner. 116-112 and 117-111. The majority in press row and on the RBR here also had it for Broner, some more narrowly.

But you think this was the biggest robbery of the year -- in the reverse direction?

Did GoldenBoy pay off IB? :think

That is an extraordinary accusation to make. Careful, Hans.

 

Graham Houston is a respected boxing scribe, here's what he said:

"There was no doubt in my mind that Broner won, but as Al Bernstein noted in the commentary, this was a fight where widely divergent scoring was always likely. Broner was moving forward throughout and landed by far the more meaningful blows, but Malignaggi was busy, throwing clusters of what used to be called “pitty pat” punches."


Wait, he said "no doubt", didn't he? If this was the biggest robbery of the year, wouldn't a respected boxing journalist like Houston have had some "doubt?"

 

Never heard of him so don't care what he thinks. The Ring was a respected boxing publication who had Broner in their pound for pound top 10. CJ Ross is an experienced judge who had Bradley beating Pacquiao and Alvarez drawing with Mayweather. :conf

Why should I take his opinion over boxing writers that had Paulie winning or the judge that had Paulie winning or my own eyes that had Paulie winning.

Broner barks and throws flashier punches, which grab people's attention more than Paulie's because there is absolutely nothing behind Paulie's. However all Paulie's shot's where scoring shot's even if they was soft. Broner simply did not land enough to win most of the rounds.

 

Another respected boxing blog, Queensberry Rules, had this to say:

"To TQBR it was a clear Broner victory, albeit one in which Malignaggi showed enormous heart and, perhaps, a blueprint for how a stronger fighter could solve “The Problem.”

Why would a respected boxing blog call an outright robbery a "clear win" for the wrong guy, SuperHans?

Was the Queensberry Rules boxing blog paid off by Golden Boy? :think

 

According to compubox (say what you will), Broner outlanded Malignaggi 246 to 216 while throwing 300 fewer punches.

How many robberies are you aware of in which the robbed fighter landed fewer punches (than the robber) according to Compubox. Can you name any? I can't think of that ever happening. :think

It's beginning to dawn on me that SuperHans is complete troll. That must be what all this means.

 

if it was a robbery, surely it would be obvious to everyone, especially an experienced and respected boxing writer like Houston and others.

If it was a robbery, why is the consensus opinion that the unpopular Broner won?

The case for you being a complete troll is getting stronger all the time.

 

Why would a win that most people debate be a clear win?

People get blinded by the sheer hype and bias commentating and flashy punches. Rewatch the fight on mute then you can't hear Broner screaming everytime he threw a punch. Paule won.

There was a poll going round a week after the fight and most had it for Paulie.

So how exactly is that a clear win for Broner.

Bet you also think Broner beat Quintero, De Leon and Maidana too atsch

 

Donaire TKO2 Montiel won most KO of the Year awards too. Does that make it a "knockout?"

 

Badlefthook, another respected boxing site (that you've probably never heard of, because, well, you're an illiterate) had this to say:

"I thought Broner deserved the win he got, but it was a lot closer than it was supposed to be, simple as that. And Broner knows that, no matter what he says."

Now, if this was the biggest robbery of the year, what gives with BadleftHook? Paid off by GoldenBoy? :think

 

Is a win that people debate a "robbery"? It's not, is it. Robberies don't need to be debated. Robberies provoke outrage, not debate.

You are a complete moron and an abysmal troll.

 

What's that got to do with anything? The Donaire one was for the punch that rightfully knocked him out before the clueless Mora allowed him to continue for about 2 seconds before he realised what an idiot he'd been.

Have you rewatched that video and still trying to tell me that Dawson could continue?

 

Why do you keep quoting people I don't know nor give a **** about? They got caught up in the hype. Paule Malignaggi "the boxing media don't know **** about boxing":

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n87BrJo5ATw[/url]

Who says they know more about boxing than judge Tom Miller who scored the fight for Malignaggi.

Paulie won that fight. Rewatch, volume off and now the Broner hype has died down tell me he won that fight.