What was the biggest robbery of 2013?

Great evidence that this was robbery of the year: the testimony of Paulie Malinaggi himself. If you ever want to get an unbiased opinion on scoring, just ask one of the contestants!

When people tell me Rios - Abril was a robbery I always tell them "bull! Brandon Rios himself said he won the fight!"

And when people tell me Pacquaio was robbed against Bradley, I always tell them "No! ask Tim Bradley. He was in the fight. He knows. He was there, up close. He saw all the angles. And he says that that he won. I take his word for it. No robbery!"

SuperHans, you kill me! You remind me of the legendary troll Silencer/Gained, you're right up there with him.

 

I'm not pointed out that Paulie says he won the fight. In fact he didn't even mention it.

I'm pointing out he says the boxing media don't know **** about boxing.

So being that he's more of a boxing insider than you or me or these people's irrelevant opinions you post from some crappy newspaper in Michigan, I will take his word for the fact that the boxing media don't know **** about boxing than any of these so called experts who you use as evidence that Broner won the fight. :hi:

 

If Paulie agreed with you that this was the biggest robbery of the year, then why did he say this in the post-fight interview:

"This is a close fight. I don't even mind having him close or me close. But it could have gone either way."

does "could have gone either way" coming from Paulie himself sound like he thought it was a robbery?

Paulie thought it was close, but then, what does he know. The real authority on all this is a guy that goes by the name of SUPER HANS. He knows a robbery when he sees one. That Super Hans, he sure is clever.

just say uncle. Get it over with.

 

Was Paulie taking into account the points deductions Broner should've been awarded in his post fight interview.

Do you believe kicking someone in the balls in a boxing contest is acceptable conduct- when even Hopkins believes it is dirty and should be a pts deduction against the Golden Boy Hype job you know there is something up

I'm not arguing the fight was close- but clear for Paulie. As I said earlier I can see 5 rounds top for Broner but no more. And this thread is robbery of the year so we are also taking into account other factors such as shady officiating. And Broner should've been deducted at least two points and maybe even DQ'd in that fight. Paulie was fighting the ref as well. Therefore robbery.

And is the reason you want me to say uncle because it reminds you of the uncle who touched you as a child and turned you into a Broner fanboy? :hi:

 

so you're out on a limb here, because Paulie himself can see 7 rounds for Broner. Because Paulie thinks it can go either way.

Now, seriously. Just how dumb are you. I mean, you're astoundingly dumb. It's breathtaking how dumb you are. It takes the breath away.

 

Why didn't you answer if you believe that kicking someone in the balls is an acceptable part of boxing? Do you think that's worthy of a points deduction?

Or the stuff about your uncle touching you that turned you into a Broner fan.

Paulie says after the fight, 'I thought I whipped him' and said the judge who had it wide for Broner was in Al Haymon's back pocket. Paulie was probably worried about going on about it too much because he didn't want to bite the hand that feeds him being he's promoted by Golden Boy and works for Showtime .

 

Easy! The stinkfest in Macau. According to progayer Macau spent 30 million promoting that event. What a robbery!

 

They were about equally close.

 

:blood
What did you eat IB?

 

:conf How did you score them?

I saw Bradley over Marquez by a round (like Hoyle), and over Provodnikov by a point even with the knockdown. (like Denkin & Cantu)

 

I had the 7-5 score the same on both, but Bradley went down in the Prov bout (actually twice). Plus there's some room for a wider score with the Marquez fight where there isn't in the Provodnikov one imo.
the scores are only comparable on paper, not on who the "who did better?" scale, cause that's clearly Prov

 

Without the knockdowns, I don't think anyone would feel they were all that dissimilar in how close & competitive they were.

Provodnikov hurt Bradley on more occasions, yes, but he fought a worse version of Bradley who admitted that he fought dumb on purpose to regain some face after the Pacquiao backlash. Also, there were long stretches between hurting Bradley where Provodnikov's aggression was no more effective (at times less) than Marquez's often was.

 

The Bradley-Provodnikov fight was in the main pretty easy to score.

There was more rounds that was close in Marquez-Bradley.

I had Bradley winning by a slightly wider margin against Marquez myself.

 

I've seen a whole lot of guys a lot worse, that's all I said from the beginning. I actually don't think I ever gave the opinion that he should have continued. Just clearly beat the 10 count as Malik Scott did against Chisora and there was outrage for that.