Muhammad Ali at his best vs. Wladimir Klitschko at his best, who wins?

Fat as.s buster mathis is better than fat as.s ross purrity:deal

At least Ali didn't lose when he fought his fat guy.

 

As many of you may disagree, ALI eats many of Vlads jabs, Ali can try to sting like a bee but he won't reach WLAD as much and hurt him. Ali get's KO'D

The old Wlad yes, but he's become more disciplined and uses his advantahes, Vitali would KO Ali as well.

 

Jesus troll you're still here?

 

Since you like statistics so much, I calculated Sanders' KO % when he fought Wlad for you:

38-2 (28 KO).

28 / 40 = 70%.

"Power puncher" Sanders only had a 70% KO ratio. And that's against so-called "Real HWs". :rofl

Also, Sanders badly rocked Vitali, a guy who's supposed to have an iron chin.

 

Of course you were going to reply with some bull**** about weight.

So, Sanders knocked out one more "non bummy" opponent than Shavers. Woopty doo. Like one more is going to make any significant difference.

Any way you spin it, that's still pretty low for a HW, let alone a "REAL HW", as you like to say.

But I'll humor you. Who were these "non-bummy" opponents that Sanders knocked out?

 

Shhh, he's just going to tell you that Tubbs was a hard-hitting real HW and would beat Ali and Frazier.

 

What a dumb thread. Neither Klit has a chance against Ali.
If they were unfortunate enough to have fought in that era, they wouldn't even have been able to get past the mid level contenders.
LOL, steroids make you super stupid.

 

Ron Lyle beats Wlad....real talk. If thought Brewster and Purrity was tough he would have in for beating agaist Lyle.

 

Wlad by TKO.

I just don't see how Ali keeps Wlad off of him the entire fight.

 

But isn't Lyle to small? After all, isnt size the only thing that matters at heavyweight?

 

I like it how no person can refute Elroy or others defending the current generation of boxing. Fact is, this is all subjective. This isn't science, or anything build on LOGIC; this is hype, media portrayal, and simply nostalgia. Favoritism is build around boxing, it is the way it goes. No intelligent person can argue in favor of Ali or any old relic of boxing against the current generation of boxing. If you happen to be intelligent, and you favor Ali over Wlad, or Vitali, it is because you are blinded by the same nostalgia, or media drivel that is present, and that intelligent person wont be able to argue in favor for his hero Ali, they would just favor Ali with no LOGICAL argument, just blind delusional nostalgia.

 

I actually got a death threat before from some Ali fan boy, but they are too much of a coward to say things to me personally. Probably belong to a certain demographic whose IQ ranges from 80-83.

There are more boxers today than back during the 70's or 30's, which means bigger talent pool. More countries participating in boxing, means more boxers, which means larger talent pool. The world wide population is also larger. It is not logical to argue otherwise.

 

Wlad takes this.

Nostalgic favoritism won't save the physically inferior Ali from Wlad's crushing offensive abilities.

 

The ali of 64-67 will absolutely school klitschkos