Wish People Would Stop saying Dinamita's punch was "Lucky".

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by modernfonzie, Jan 4, 2014.


  1. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
  2. Meazy-E

    Meazy-E Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    20
    Aug 8, 2012
    Pac is predictable with left straight, JMM is one of the best counterpunchers in the business. Was a matter of time.
     
  3. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,117
    2,754
    Jul 20, 2004
    The punch in the video was a slip punch, the KO punch was an overhand right. Marquez always fought like that and was always known to be a first class counter puncher. Marquez pretty much preys upon reckless fighters and Pacquiao decided to be overly reckless.
     
  4. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,082
    13,314
    Dec 2, 2012
    There's only one group of people whining about that punch:hey
     
  5. Holy Grail

    Holy Grail Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,055
    52
    Sep 13, 2013
    There's only one group who are delusional about JMM not using steroids :hey
     
  6. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    Yes that one group = the sane population.

    The group that believes he's using roids = *******s.

    Get over it.

    Marquez KO6 Pacquiao!
     
  7. LastQuark

    LastQuark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,928
    0
    Apr 29, 2006
    Pac accidentally stepped on his foot as he is coming in and lost his footing as soon as Marquez removed it. He was able to capitalized on that Pac mistake.

    Your call if you call that lucky or not.
     
  8. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,082
    13,314
    Dec 2, 2012
    Steroids don't make you a better boxer and JMM has always had a higher KO percentage than Pac:deal

    KTFO6 ................. Deal with it and let the hurt start healing!
     
  9. illwill007

    illwill007 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,903
    1
    Apr 10, 2010
    I don't think that the punch was lucky, as in I don't think Marquez unskillfully just threw a punch and hoped for the best. He's one of the best counter punchers in the game. He was very prepared to land that punch. However, that punch was perfect, and the opportunity was perfect. In the fight he needed a massive opportunity and to change the momentum Pacquiao had. I don't think that outcome is likely to be duplicated. On the other hand, Pacquiao was busting Marquez up, and that is likely to be repeated if there is a fifth fight.
     
  10. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,082
    13,314
    Dec 2, 2012
    Pac had a great 5th round but by the middle of the 6th JMM did what he has been doing since the first round of the first fight and that is ad******g well.

    JMM has proved himself the superior boxer for 42 rounds and Pac's only chance at a convincing victory would be if Marquez is shot.


    P.S. Can't even post the word ad just ing here. SMFH
     
  11. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    10,232
    0
    Nov 25, 2013
    it was not the punch itself. jmm had landed similar punches in the past.

    it landed at a time when pac momentarily lost focus due to their feet entangled.

    pac wasnt able to put weight on his front foot, so he wasnt able to harden his face/stiffen his neck.

    it should be called perfect punch because it landed at perfect time.

    jmm had 15m reasons to prove it wasnt lucky. why not do it again and get paid doing it?

    he knows he cant. lightning doesnt strike twice.


    anyway, pac is not after jmm first, he is after the coward.
     
  12. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
    First, its steroids. Then its he stepped on his foot. Then its a lucky punch. THen its, Pac isnt dedicated to the sport. Which is it?

    What coward? That 45-0 fresh of dominating another undefeated fighter in which he gave 15 pounds and 13 years to? That coward?:hey:deal
     
  13. rapscalion

    rapscalion Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,849
    761
    Oct 7, 2010
    It was a perfect couterpunch
     
  14. Impulse_0

    Impulse_0 Active Member Full Member

    1,475
    612
    Oct 22, 2011
    They fought 42 close rounds.

    All fights were battles. It is stupid to say, considering how close ALL the fights were, that either fighter is clearly superior to the other.

    I would say the same thing if Pacman won. Either fighter was capable of taking out the other and if they fought again it would be 50/50 again.

    Carry on convincing yourself that KO6 somehow makes the previous 41 close rounds they fought meaningless. :rofl

    I just find some of you guys lack common sense.
     
  15. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,104
    Jul 24, 2004
    Because Marquez know that fair judging will never prevail in a fight between him and Pacquiao.

    Marquez pretty much has to fight within the confines of Pacquiao's strenghth to officially get a victory over Pacquiao.

    It speaks to the state of boxing that a great boxer like Marquez who can anytime he wishes fight the gameplan he did in fight 3 and dominate Pacquiao, he has to turn from what he does best and become a seek and destroy assasin if he does'nt want the fight stolen from him.


    Btw, it will take more than 15 million reasons to lure Marquez into a 5th fight with Pacquiao.
    If Pacquiao were serious about getting revenge, he'd sign on the dotted line 50/50 share alike!

    Pacquiao dont want the risk of getting KTFO again while sharing equal!:yep