Carl Froch - Man or Mouse?

if you feel froch ain't worthy of your respect, what in hell have you done to demand mine?

 

I would disagree with your definition of coward. Be brave, yes, but be smart. You are confusing stupidity with brave.

Secondly, are you American? What with the constant mentions of 'honorable' rather than honourable?

Thirdly as a part of the Groves fancy, surely you have enough confidence in your man to not resort to goading people to fight him with crass remarks?

Groves moved up a level in his last bout. If a Froch bout is not going to happen soon which does seem the case, surely you belief George can continue to fight at the level he did against Carl, maybe even improve? Thus surely you would have enough confidence in him to fight other top fighters at 168?

If this is the case then let Froch do what he wants. Maybe down the line a rematch happens, but perhaps it does not. But as a Groves fan, surely you worry about your man not any potential opponent?

 

So a coward is facing every top boxer in the division
A coward is getting knocked over in round one and taking beating for another 7 rounds and coming back and putting ginger in trouble ??

What does that make Burns. You can put all the pressure on Froch sweaty but Burns ain't done half of what froch has ....deal with it

 

respect aint won its fu cking hard earnt numb nuts
now little lion man run along back to mummy

 

He isnt a coward but if he doesnt face either Ward or Groves next-both his greatest challenges to date since avenging Kessler, then he can hardly claim he will fight anyone anywhere and is a warrior for much longer. He has been caaling Ward out for near on 2 years, Ward has said pick up the phone and get it done, its on Froch now.

If he wants payday fights with the likes of Chavez which he will probably be favourite for then fine, but just say so and drop the claims mentioned above.

A true warrior takes on his greatest rivals knowing how big the challenge is-will Froch choose to?

 

lets look at it like this at this moment in time , groves options having now lost his mandatory position / work his way back in to contention maybe call out bika or a degale rematch to capture degales ranking.
froch options , chavez , adonis , ward , ggg , also winner pascal v bute and if froch is feeling charitable he could donate groves a rematch

 

Of course there are options but why not face the man you have been calling out for 2 years or so then when you get the chance to avenge that defeat go elsewhere, unless your bothered about money and not his 'legacy' that he bangs on about haha

 

care to mention any other fighter of recent times that as turned down money for legacy :think
froch did what joe would not now you all want froch to be the first to put legacy before money :huh **** you all aint asking for much ,
rule for one the same rule as to apply for the other , would you take a pay cut work longer hours just so your boss is able to say " you see that guy there he is a legend in this work place " of course you would

 

Back up a second because your questioning me,w hen its Froch who has gone on about it is it not?

Where did i say i would pick legacy over money? Froch goes on about 'warrior' and 'legacy' well the fights defining that would be against his 2 greatest challenges to date would they not?

Oh and Froch didnt want to fight Groves, he deemed him unworthy but Eddie forced his hand with getting Groves mandatory.

And your office example was ridiculous by the way, how can you compare to sporting events which are televised worldwide to an office worker? Dont care on your explanation here though, its just a stupid example

 

its his job he gets paid for it , just like you in yours