I don't have a problem with him. Seems like if someone doesn't like someone's commentary style, he thinks they're rubbish and if he doesn't see things the same way as you, he's biased.
I just love how much enthusiasm Watt has for his job and how he gets excited when a fighter gets hurt. Even when Groves landed those 2 short right hands in the 1st round of the Froch fight "aww...beautiful right hands!!!" *in a quick fiery voice*
True.It had to be said.I know Watt doesn't set the world alight,but I quite like him.Cant see how people can say he doesn't know his stuff.And one other thing:He was a fighting champion,and it took a great fighter to beat him.I can think of two.
Troll indeed!!!Leave the Wattster alone,enjoy this boxing sage and guru whie you can.I don't suppose after the referendum he will get a work permit:twisted:
I like him, think he's good. Tells it like he sees it and doesn't follow an agenda. If you're going to have a go at someone on the Sky team then surely then that should be Glen McCrory. What does he bring to the table exactly? Now Richie Woodhall on the other hand. There is an awful commentator.
I love Jim Watt. Terrific voice, genuine enthusiasm that adds to the atmosphere, and his catchphrases are gold. His scorecards can be a bit left field, but I can accept that. Halling is the real problem with the Sky commentary team. He is woeful.