Re-watched Pacquiao vs. Bradley

[yt]WTmQA9GkyBs[/yt]

 

Maybe because arum knows Pac is near retirement and needed a new Cash cow.

 

No doubt Pacquiao vs Bradley is one of the most shameful robbery in boxing history.

Bradley did not win a single round, at best and being kind to Bradley he won only 1 round.

 

@1:15 Pac does a similar move to the one that got him KTFO by Marquez. Bradley just didn't capitalize one it.

I had Pac way ahead on the scorecards in that fight but IMO Bradley will make it a lot closer this time.

 

THIS

Arum robbed pac in the first fight...his mistake was thikning bradley would be much more competitive than he was.
He thought it would still be a very controversial decision that would drum up interest in a rematch...but he didnt think it would be a shutout.

In the end he had to sell timmy down the river after the fight (pretend to be outraged).

Thankfully for him timmy was in the fight of the year with providnikov and schooled marquez (which i knew he could).

Bob shouldnt be so stupid to actually develop timmy though...tim will bail as soon as his contract is up for a Mayweather fight.

Feed him to Pacquiao now...dont be stupid. He served his purpose.:hi:

 

i still have pac winning, i think shane did a better job than Bradley

 

Get over it Bradley won the damn fight. Pacquiao didn't do **** in that fight. People claiming Bradley lost big in that fight are racist. and nothinng more.

 

from now on lets all score boxing match from missed shots :good

 

I had it a draw

 

I might be JLCs biggest fan on here, and I scored it for him, but it was no robbery by any stretch.

Bradley over Pac was armed robbery to the fullest. One of the most blatant robberies of our time.

 

Bradley needed a KO going into the 9th to win the fight.

 

No he didn't, Pac was hitting glove and arm, I had Pac ahead by 2 but every time I watch it I get a different score. It was a close fight. Bradley have far better defense than Pacquiao.

 

115-113 Pac

most of the rounds were close, he took way too much time off

 

The first time I watched it on HBO live, I scored it 116-112 Pacquiao. Many months later, I rewatched the fight from a Russian broadcast. I had the volume off and the replays between rounds were not nearly so pro-Pac. I scored it with Bradley winning by two rounds. Bradley does roll/slip a lot of punches, and not quite so exaggerated like he did vs Marquez where his rolls were super exaggerated, perhaps for the Judges' sakes. Pacquiao's volume was also waaaay down compared to almost all of his other fights. Honestly, I think in a rematch, I look for Pacquiao to win the second time around. I think Pac's heart is maybe in boxing a little more now, perhaps hoping to get that Mayweather shot, but I don't think Pac was the usual Pac vs Bradley. Perhaps it was a testament to Bradley, perhaps Pac wasn't on his game. It was a close fight. Honestly, I would not have a problem with the scoring going two rounds for either guy, but I think Bradley by 2 is just as viable of a score and was my score, after I rewatched it on a Russian feed (i.e. without bias).

 

i saw that video and yes Pac missed a lot but the pronlblem for Tim is he didn't throw much of his own