Does Broner deserve a rematch with Maidana?

I say YES, He gave Maidana a shot... A favor for a favor.

 

Broner needs to give rematches to Ponce De Leon, Malignaggi, and Quintero. Maidana is right in saying that GBP hid Khan after that lucky win and never gave him a rematch.

 

And paulie gave broner a shot in a much closer fight, one which a lot of people thought paulie won, broner didn't consider a rematch.

Maidana destroyed broner, I gave broner 2 rounds, I don't think he deserves a rematch at all.

 

Nope!

 

Broner = Ratings learn the boxing business.
Rematch will happen regardless of the haters.
(Or maybe "because" of them??)

Tune in.

 

when you sign a contract with a rematch clause...you have no choice but to honor that if the fighter chooses to exercise that clause. it has absolutely nothing to do with what we think.

 

It doesn't matter if he deserves it at all really tbh, when you draw viewers and having big financial and promotional backing (including having Al Haymon as your manager) then you can get what you want regardless and that's what will happen.

He's making a mistake anyway I think, he'd be smarter to avoid a rematch and build up again at 140 with a tune up or two.

He wasn't trying to give Maidana a favour, don't try to make it look like Broner was giving Maidana an act of charity by letting him share a ring with him.

 

I thought Top Rank is the only one who's recycling fights. :rofl

 

did paulie, pdl or any of the others mentioned have rematch clauses in their contracts with him? gbp has no say in the matter.

 

it was broner who was taking the bigger risk in that match up. make no mistake about it....broner did maidana a favor by fighting him. he was not obligated to do so.

 

broner mentioned the rematch clause in his interview with jim gray...at least that's what i thought...maybe i read it.