The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. shinkuhadoken

    shinkuhadoken Member Full Member

    474
    0
    Jun 28, 2008
    Dimension aside. Pac is generally small considering he came from 112.
     
  2. HolyCityBully

    HolyCityBully Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,636
    1
    Nov 25, 2007

    The discussion was whether or not Marquez was p4p #2 at the time.

    Another poster said he had Cotto over Marquez.

    At that particular time, I do not see how that is possible.
     
  3. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    10,232
    0
    Nov 25, 2013
    idiot.

    the divisions are separated by mass/weight.( because it is the easiess/closest to size estimate.)

    your question was about size.

    dumb****. if i say *****s have teh brain of the ******, the ****** would get insulted.

    size is big, small.

    weight/mass= heavy , light.

    learn ******.
     
  4. shinkuhadoken

    shinkuhadoken Member Full Member

    474
    0
    Jun 28, 2008
    But i don't want this crap. We want void
     
  5. Brian

    Brian Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,890
    0
    Feb 15, 2010
    You have to be 13 or something.
     
  6. Brian

    Brian Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,890
    0
    Feb 15, 2010
    Cotto??? That's ridiculous!
     
  7. bobotnaman

    bobotnaman ★★★★☆ Full Member

    3,884
    1
    Sep 8, 2011
    :deal
     
  8. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    I am only trying to understand *******s. So since Pwill is Taller and has longer reach than Mike Tyson he would be considered bigger? or since tyson has a heavier body mass they are the same size? I do not understand ******* . . . please enlighten me.

    In the real world size is weight and that is why most sports that divide by size go by weight and not dimensions.

    Lets imagine if we divided the different sizes by height and reach and not weight
     
  9. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    you got to be shitting me.

    Mayweather fighting Marquez is like Pacquiao fighting Marquez. How about that :nut
     
  10. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
  11. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    10,232
    0
    Nov 25, 2013
    damn.

    pwill is ww/sww.

    tyson is heavyweight.

    like i said, size is both mass/dimension.


    when you say tyson is small heavyweight, that is true because he is short and has short reach for a heavyweight.

    what he lacks in size, he makes up for speed and power.

    you dont say tyyson is light, because he makes the heavywight limit so technically he is considered a heavyweight but small.



    edit: mass is approximately weight not size.

    Force = Mass x Acceleration

    Weight = Mass x Graviational Acceleration (gravity= 9.81m/sec squared)

    Mass is basically is the same as Weight bec the gravitional acceleration is constant.

    during weigh in, mass is measured (kg, lbs). if you want to know the weight, you multiply it with 9.81, and the unit is in Newton, kgF, lbF.

    weighing scales is actually weighing mass not weight.


    size is both mass and dimension.

    hearns is a big ww, precisely because of his height and long reach. but if he can make ww, then he weighs enough to be considered ww.

    take this from a guy whose hobbies dont include getting punched int he face.:good
     
  12. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    :deal
     
  13. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    Fixed it for ya:D
     
  14. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,123
    5,606
    Nov 5, 2013
    2 accounts, 1 ******.
     
  15. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    BTW, SO who is bigger?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.