So my uncle was nearly right.He was there and said Mills a lot bigger.They were wrong about Marshall.
They surely were, but Ted Broadribb, Millls's manager and father in law put Freddie in matches that would have been more at home in the Roman Colisseum.
I'm not getting into another debate with an agenda driven poster, I have enough of that with Mendoza.
NO agenda in that or ANY of my posts McVey, just stating the fact about Mills' size and weight. He WAS a L-HW cum HW and he was introduced as such in the RING Magazine as early as 1940. he did fight a couple of boys too big for him I agree whole heartedly and I forgot to add Jack London to the two I mentioned. I am a Mills fan & supporter. He is a lot better than some people credit him with, this is seen not only in those fights with the Big boys but also in his two battles with Lesnevich, both great fights and Mills beat him good and well in the return. and Lesnevich is a certain great!
Sugar Ray Seales. US Olympic gold Winner at Munich 1972. He never got the attention or back-up he deserved. Never got a shot at the title. Lost 90% of his sight on both eyes - but still managed to win fights. I saw him lose to Auyb Kalule over 10 rounds in 1979 and it was obvious he had problems measuring the distance of his punches.
What did he do that would put him in the top ten? In the company of Moore Charles Burley Williams Marshall Booker Langford Burns O Brien Delaney McAvoy Gibbons etc 3 signature wins Minter,Tonna,Seales Decent, but not top ten imo
Probably, anyway i think the thread has got to the point people are just throwing other good contenders yet to get a vote.