Name a fight (or fights) you think that stylistically would end up being one sided but you can't really predict in favor of who. One of mine would be Golovkin v Mayweather. Golovkin may be too big and powerful for Mayweather and pulverize him or Mayweather may be too quick and slick for Golovkin and school him.
Wilder vs any almost heavyweight not called Wlad K: KO within 4 to either fighter. Deontay is so wild and open that you suspect anyone capable of landing a stiff counter-punch might spark him pretty quickly. On the other hand, Deontay only has to land once, and Wlad is the only heavyweight I am certain has sufficient nimbleness / dirty clinching ability to avoid that human threshing machine until an opportunity presents itself.
delusions changed to hallucinations:rofl:rofl *****, you need medications.:hi: are you thinking about c/w of 152? maybe.:deal
1. Please explain how I'm a *****, when I cannot stand him 2. Rather than criticize my choices, lets see some of yours? :think
i hate underhanded ****. you made the thread, i asked you, are you thinking c/w of 152? what exactly lead you to believe it is 1 sided either way?
are you thinking about 152 c/w? it is easy to make dumb post when you know it's not gonna happen. floyd will ask to chop ggg hand before even considering fighting the guy.
Answer this: Name a fight or fights, you think will be one sided but you don't know which fighter it will be one sided for. That's what this thread is about and you've posted a few times and yet to name one. If you just want to hate on Mayweather or Pacquiao, then toodle pip, because there is a massive thread dedicated to it here: [url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=249036[/url]
idiot. it is easy to spot a *****. fanstasy ****. put out floyd's name out there against ggg, when you know floyd wont even dare fight him. dumb thread started by a *****. :hi:
Old Foreman vs Tyson in the early 90's? Either Tyson destroy's Foreman for as many one sided rounds as his chin holds up or Foreman duplicates his Frazier fights.
What do you think about Floyd vs Valuev Progamer? Personally I think Floyd wins a wide UD but I could see Valuev winning if Floyd breaks his hand or something. :hat
First, go read some of Hans other posts. It will quickly become evident that he is not a Floyd fan. I have always gotten the impression he is however, a GGG fan. Someone is looking awfully goofy right now and its not Hans. Second, its obvious he was just giving an example to illustrate the type of matchups he was thinking about. Matchups where each fighter is particularly strong in certain attributes, and if they are able to bring those attributes into full play they will have an overwhelming advantage... but where its hard to tell which guy would be able to do so. For me right now an intriguing matchup along those lines is Mora-Stevens. Stevens is working on his jab, and has very quick hands. Mora is expert at not getting hit cleanly. Would Stevens catch up to him , and use his handspeed to find Moras chin - or would Mora pull a Charlo on him and have Stevens hitting nothing but air and glove for 10 rounds? Either Mora gets Majewskied, or Stevens gets Rosadoed and im really not sure which.
Dude go to another thread and stop messing up every thread that mentions the name Floyd. everybody is not a ***** and you telling everybody that means u are:rasta:rasta
:good I don't like Floyd as a person but I can't argue he's a magnificent boxer- and I'm not ruling him out against anybody at 160 or below, including GGG.