Groves: Froch is scared of damage in rematch

He needs to concentrate on training so what if you have lost your zero, to be honest IMO DeGale took his Zero first.

He needs to be working on conditioning because he was on the decline as Froch was revving up in that last fight. I had big respect for the show Groves put on in the last fight and had him up by 4, I do feel though he was on his way to being stopped when the ref came in early if not that round the next 2.

 

Degale did not get he better of groves ffs

 

I had that fight as a draw, it was a close fight.

 

nice to see simba carrying on with his melt down :tired

 

Brilliant :yep:yep maybe it is king khan under a new name :yep:yep

 

watson i think you've cracked it dear boy :deal

 

groves and khan became friendly after that fight :yep also after meeting taking the same path :think :deal , bitches are like peas they come in pods :hey

 

never, because, exactly like your figures and "insights" into froch's state of mind, you pull proverbs out your arse.

 

Surprise surprise another non related boxing post :-(

Anyway now you know to be careful of what you sign for, but if only you knew that a long time ago you wouldn't be up to your eyes in dept

 

simba pulling more random shi t out his ass again
4 weeks roughly with nigh on 800 posts , only one troll here

 

Actually agree with this Froch doesn't see Groves punches coming half the time. 1st round shows who badly shaken Froch was when he hit the floor. And getting smashed for 6 rounds I don't care who u are will have a effect. Can't remember exactly who posted the vid but Paddy Fitzpatrick mentioned the damage Froch took. And maybe he shouldn't take a rematch then goes on to say about the people around him and making sure he has the right checks scans etc etc.

 

your struggles with reason are plain for everybody to see, so i'll understand if you fail to grasp the following concept, despite its simplicity.

i ain't convinced that making up a bunch of **** then presenting it as fact on the internet constitutes "boxing related", but if it does, then my direct response to such is, by definition, "boxing related".

if my direct response is not "boxing related", then neither are your points to which i respond. logic dictates it can't be both.

if you want "boxing related" check my post on the froch lb for lb thread in the general, taken from notes for an article i'm writing for a sports journalism website.

i would dearly love to see any 1 of you keyboard warriors call froch a cowardly ducker to his face.

 

froch has made a career of getting smacked in the mush though. the gg right hand in the 1-2 that put froch down (the slo-mo looks like froch is out when it lands) was a sensational punch, but the fact the same shot landed repeatedly in the 6th without dropping him suggest to me gg was already fading, rather than froch's chin improving.

 

I would gladly call him it to his face.

 

I think Froch took more damage in that fight than at any point in his career. Time will tell, but he just couldn't see the punches coming. You can't get hit that much and not have sustained any damage.