Sam Langford discusses his Jack Johnson fight and ducking

I WILL TRY ONCE MORE.WHEN I SAID THE "people's choice" I MEANT THE BLACK PEOPLES' NOT WHITE.ONE MORE TIME ON TATE(I DO NOT KNOW WHY YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND)IT IS NOT HIS SKILL OR RANKING,JUST HIS PURE SIZE AND THE PROBLEMS IT COULD CAUSE ANY SHORT, LIGHT MAN.TO ME,IT SHOWS SAM'S TALENT.I AM SURE YOU KNOW OF UNSKILLED FIGHTERS WHO DID FAIRLY WELL BASED ON SIZE ALONE,I KNOW,I DO.
Why on earth do you think the White Hope Era started in the first place? YOU ARE SUCH A CONDESCENDING ****HEAD! OF COURSE YOU MENTAL MIDGET, I KNOW WHAT THE WHITE HOPE ERA SIGNIFIES! ARE YOU TRYING TO BE STUPID? STOP TELLING ME TO RESEARCH DICKHEAD, I HAVE ORIGINAL BOOKS AND MAGAZINES (ABOUT BOXING)FROM 1920 THRU THE 2000'S! I RESEARCH VERY WELL YOU PINHEAD! BUTT OF JOKES? FROM STRANGERS? I REALLY GIVE A **** OF THEIR OPINIIONS YOU CRETIN! WAS SAM GREEN? I DO NOT CARE HE WAS FIGHTING ONE OF THE GREATEST HEAVYWEIGHTS OF ALL TIME AND HE WAS NOT EVEN A ****ING MIDDLEWEIGHT! THAT IS THE ONLY POINT I MADE OR CARE! AGAIN,JOHNSON WOULD FIGHT OTHER BLACKS BUT NOT SAM! I ALSO READ A 2ND MEETING ON A STAGE AND JOHNSON SAID THEY WRESTLED AND BOXED AND SAM LANDED A GOOD BLOW THAT CONVINCED HIM HE WAS VERY DANGEROUS! BUT LIKE ANY ACCOUNT WHO THE **** REALLY KNOWS? YOU HORSES ASS! I DO NOT USE SECRET JOKES TO MOCK SOMEONE(NOW THAT'S MATURE) I JUST DRILL THEM WITH A LEFT HOOK TO THE BODY AND THAT USUALLY ENDS THAT.SO YOUR FRIENDS CAN SUCK IT!

 

When Johnson was champion the black population of the United States was just over 10% so your argument is essentially that Langford was 10% of people's choice as the best contender (assuming he had 100% of the black vote). Good luck with that overwhelming support he had.

I agree Johnson should have defended against him but your arguments are weak, biased, severely flawed.

Please dont hit me with a left hook to the body for pointing this out you big scary guy hiding behind your computer screen... :bbb

 

I don't know about you but I'm terrified.

 

Fred Mckay had a record of 20 fights 6 wins ,12 losses 11 by ko, he kod Tate in 8rds .Does this result show his talent?:think Johnson was not one of the greatest hevayweights of all time when he fought Langford in1906 he was 20/ 25 lbs below his optimum weight and was two years away from winning the title.You make a rambling nonsensical post filled with personal insults and end with bragging about hitting people who disagree with you. All from the safety and anonymity of your pc.

You've made a complete show of yourself with your last two posts, a public humiliation that anyone would have struggled to top,and you did it all on your own.

How old are you, about twelve?

 

shut the **** up!

 

why? Are you into young boys,perv. I can't believe your still trying to prove how unworthy tate was,i think i have said more than once i bring him up for his great size advantage. jesus what the hell is wrong with you? what the **** our you saying???? johnson WHEN CHAMP was a great champ,Langford himself said so. i think you are just trying to **** me off,your arguments are either the same or way off point.for you,a left hook to the body followed by a lighting fast right upper cut.your "public" can suck my nut sack.

 

I have a feeling you have photos of yourself in a boxing stance.

"lightning fast" A ridiculous fantasist.
Thanks for the entertainment Jennette

USA!:hi:

ps You've spelt your user name wrong, it starts with a C , not an F.

 

Usa usa usa!!!!!

 

:good

 

Wow. Been out of the loop lately. Quality entertainment provided herein.

 

That's why its called "Classic".
USA:good

 

I have a feeling you have photos of yourself getting ****ed in the ass. that "Jennette" thing has got to be hands down the gayest thing ever,do you really believe it bothers anyone but you and your nerdy cohorts? i can't even imagine you or your online lovers in a boxing stance,just bent over or on your knees.

 

Nerdy cohorts who would they be? I boxed for 18 years ,but not to any great standard. It was a good excuse to get in the showers with other men. Speak soon Sweetie.:asskiss

 

i will end this "meeting of the minds" by saying,i read and post on these sites to be educated(sometimes) or to exchange opinions(most times). We are not discussing philosophy,religion or politics.we are not here to find the cure for cancer or how to end human suffering,or is there life after death.just discussing a sport.i do not ever resort to name calling, but when some come across ordering me to "do research" or an overall condescending tone,it does **** me off.why do some people become so serious and rude over a friendly conversation concerning an activity we all love(and some like me) have participated in? I think views are shaped and opinions influenced better when a more civil tone is used.if you just visit to confront others,the best place would be
in the ring.thanks.