Floyd Mayweather vs. Amir Khan speculation & discussion

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Aug 14, 2011.


  1. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,891
    3,270
    Jun 30, 2005
    It may give him problems for like 2 rounds.

    Khan's skills and brains are light years behind Floyd. He throws bull**** flurries without any accuracy, they don't create and exploit openings and people go "wow, look at his skills!!" :lol::rofl

    The only way Khan wins is if Mayweather suffers some freak injury and breaks his leg or something.
     
  2. EJDiaZ

    EJDiaZ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    415
    Aug 21, 2010
  3. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    He wins by shutout.
     
  4. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    21
    Jul 28, 2008
    what a stupid waste of time then
     
  5. AlanKnight

    AlanKnight New Member Full Member

    66
    0
    Aug 27, 2011
    why was it. it hyped floyds next fight. great publicity
     
  6. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,160
    5,372
    May 22, 2011
    Maidana is the better choice of opponents between the two. His chances of making Floyd sweat is better and although Floyd will most likely win, he will know that he was in a fight, because Maidana is not gonna back down and will be trying to win from round one until the end. Khan, on the other hand,( once Mayweather hurts him ) will be running at full speed just like he did with Peterson. Maidana is coming to win but Khan is coming to get paid.
     
  7. Colt Seevers

    Colt Seevers Member Full Member

    256
    1
    Sep 20, 2013
    Khan won the vote. Yet still, same old ****. Floyd making a mockery of the fans
     
  8. Above Deck

    Above Deck Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,887
    177
    Nov 10, 2008
    Khan better not talk too loud, Prescott might hear him.
     
  9. Above Deck

    Above Deck Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,887
    177
    Nov 10, 2008
    It's better than fighting Prescott's leftovers.
     
  10. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,684
    Sep 8, 2010
    He has a point.

    How lame that every fighter who has taken a loss is not a credible opponent because they are someone's leftovers, yet those same people try to claim that the 0 loss mark means nothing... how exactly?
     
  11. lightsout978

    lightsout978 Member Full Member

    244
    0
    Sep 10, 2013
    How many times does this guy need to get knocked out before he realizes he is not an elite fighter?
     
  12. YCGS

    YCGS Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,067
    1,270
    Sep 13, 2013
    The whole "leftovers" thing was Floyds big talk a couple years ago, remember?
     
  13. Colt Seevers

    Colt Seevers Member Full Member

    256
    1
    Sep 20, 2013
    Because the odds are against him. Totaling all UK/USA fights in history the UK has won 76% of fights in UK/USA contests. As a new yorker I hate to admit this but cant ignore the factual evidence. We have gone soft after being fed too much glutin. Sad but true.
     
  14. Colt Seevers

    Colt Seevers Member Full Member

    256
    1
    Sep 20, 2013
    Owned
     
  15. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,684
    Sep 8, 2010
    USA brings in fighters from all countries to fight.

    UK brings in journeyman low level underdog US fighters over the pond to generate interest and keep the Brits from knocking each other out. And then they've got Brit refs on their side along with Brit judges. Say what you want about US judging being every bit as bad, but the officiating is nowhere close to as lousy, destructive to the competition of the match, and sometimes outright blatantly bias.