Can you please explain why? What does Carl do better than George? Other than getting smashed in the face repeatedly whilst still managing to stay up?
Maybe ask every bookmaker in the UK ... As there isn't a single, solitary one that doesn't have Froch as a clear favourite to win the 2nd fight and Groves as the underdog :good The bookies are very rarely wrong ...
Like both these lads,but if Carl has one good fight left in him,big if in my opinion,I suspect his sheer bloody minded will to win May see him through.
Of course not, but there are gamblers who could easily beat the bookies were they allowed to get their bets on. I'm no expert but have had my accounts restricted on multiple sites. Bookies are a joke nowadays.
Which part out of interest? I think Froch wins and is the right price but I didn't read anything from Solaris there that didn't make sense
Groves fought his best possible fight last time and Froch close to his worst. He was pretty much knocked out cold in round 1 and took several rounds to recover. Despite this come round 6/7 it was Froch that was fresher and stronger. If he couldn't finish that version of Feoch he has no chance we a welk prepared one
you say its easy to beat the bookies then say you are no expert....you are a complete idiot now and again the bookies get it wrong,if you are so convinced Groves will win get every penny you can get together and bet on him you will double or treble you money
On June 1st Froch will be in hospital after taking a terrible beating in the most one sided fight ever,Froch was slow last time,wait until this fight and see how he looks every one of his 37 years.