Terrence Crawford

You haven't got a clue he was all over the show gettin hurt of a n average super feather Saturday night he gets beat of Ricky also Mitchell also Flanagan and throw crolla in the mix he showed loads of heart the other night b sensible and don't get carried away lad

 

You talking about Coyle here? (in the Crawford thread)

 

whole new ball game for crawford sat night, he attained his very first passport only last week, the crowd, ricky's pressure, ugliness of glasgow, its accent, its birds...............none of this is going to be to his liking.

 

Uh yes. I take it the other night was your first time ever seeing him?

...and if you think Burns would deal with Vazquez any easier you'd be mistaken.

 

If Crawford gets the win in Glasgow big respect to him, I don't imagine it being an easy place to go. Burns has looked bad in his last few fights but I really can't pick a winner here. People who have been following Crawford reckons he will do it.

 

If he were to lose I'd be thefirsttoshake terrances hand because I will know that he's a special fighter to beat Ricky.
To many English simply don't rate Ricky but he's way better than any. Of your own simple

 

why are you trying to turn this into an arguement about nationality? I'm English but I'm rooting for Ricky, I just happen to think Crawford will be too good on the night, does that mean that I'm jealous of Ricky?

 

Stop being a twat, this has nothing to do with nationality and you know it.

 

He has just said "too many English simply don't rate Ricky".My answer to you is those people.I can't specifically name names of posters Ive read who come into this category,but there are some.To Billy Nelson I would say he is right,but more do rate Billy than don't.Probably more Scottish people rate him because he is Scottish,just like Brook is rated higher in Sheffield than in the rest of the country.
Possibly "apologise" is a bit too strong a word.What I maybe should have said is admit they are wrong that Ricky isn't a top class champion if he beats Crawford.Now Ive explained myself to you,tell me what you think,in more than one sentence please.

 

Burns has been stealing a living for the past couple of years.

His luck runs out on Saturday.

I've been in talks with my account managers at several bookies about getting a large bet on. It looks like I'll be able to get 30k on Crawford, if I spread it around a few firms.

I'd like to thank Ricky Burns and Billy Nelson for his free money I'm going to make on Saturday.

Disciples are advised to put everything they have on Crawford. I was robbed in the Beltran fight. I won't be robbed this Saturday.

 

We're you not the **** that alledgedly lost 18k on Broner? Not the best are you

 

Just make sure you keep me in mind when Crawfords hand is raised and my bank account is credited with almost 15k.

If the bookies would take bets on your blubbery arse getting fatter I'd have a few k on.

 

Burns has beaten Moses and Mitchell, Crawford and Shafikov have never beaten a top ten fighter, therefore how can you have them on a higher tier than Burns?
Mitchell has the wins over John Murray and Prescott, Crawford only has the win over Prescott, and Shafikov has decent wins over Rahimov and Mensah, and I'm a Shafikov fan (he is my profile pic after all) but he is not on a higher tier than Burns

Also, I've always said Vazquez is the best lightweight in the world (although I didn't expect him to deal with Shafikov so easily) even back when most people laughably had De Marco in that spot


Anyway, Burns UD over the vastly over-rated Crawford

 

Crawford has never handed a one sided beatdown to a fighter above C level

and that's twice you've called him Miguel Gonzalez, it's Jose Gonzalez