Mr.Broner would put a Gavin Rees on Matthysse if they were to meet May 3rd.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MVC!, Feb 24, 2014.


  1. box4life11

    box4life11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,614
    18
    Apr 5, 2009
    Stylistic nightmare please explain how?
     
  2. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,613
    Nov 5, 2013
    Broner with his longer reach can keep him at bay with his jab.

    And his power will carry MUCH better from 135>140 and will hurt Matthysse with his right hands.

    No one @ 35 could take the man's punches, Matthysse will not be able to either at 40.

    Broner will also be far too defensive and roll many of Matthysse's punches

    Broner will land repeatedly on Matthysse which will lead to Matthysse getting knocked out by the 8th round. It will be a destruction.

    It's the inside game as well that Broner has that will give Matthysse fits if Matthysse manages to get in. Broner is better than him at fighting on the inside.
     
  3. box4life11

    box4life11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,614
    18
    Apr 5, 2009
    :patsch I'm starting to think you just make up dumb **** just to get reactions on this site.
     
  4. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super Oneā„¢ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    What your forgetting about the Rees match is Rees exploited holes in Broner's shoulder role defence but didn't score the knock out because he is feather fisted and was outweighed by about 50 pounds.

    Imagine Matthysse connecting with Broner's glass chin when he exploits holes in Broner's defense- RIP BRONER
     
  5. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,613
    Nov 5, 2013
    Well it's dumb to you because you're a notorious Matthysse nuthugger.
     
  6. box4life11

    box4life11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,614
    18
    Apr 5, 2009
    Read the other comments then idiot


    Matthysse would make easy work of Broner.
     
  7. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,613
    Nov 5, 2013
    Yes the opinions of some FORUM-Goers whom have never boxed b4 are clearly objective and clearly 100% right :rofl:patsch

    Many of them talk out of their asses and have never seen the ring in their lives.

    What do I care about their opinion?
     
  8. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,613
    Nov 5, 2013
    Broner wou ld knock him out @ 140.

    I told you, it's a stylistic matchup in favour of Broner.
     
  9. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    So you've boxed before and still come out with this ridiculous ****? you must have brain damage worse than James Toney
     
  10. box4life11

    box4life11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,614
    18
    Apr 5, 2009
    No that's your opinion and nobody buys it on this forum so keep talking **** doesn't mean your right:deal
     
  11. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,613
    Nov 5, 2013
    Ridiculous? It's called analysing a fight and it's clear as day that Broner has an advantage in styles vs Matthysse

    Even Ray Charles can see it.

    But it's ok. You can continue being ignorant. :deal
     
  12. frosty36

    frosty36 Active Member Full Member

    1,018
    5
    Nov 11, 2011
    Lucas would knock Broner out
     
  13. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,613
    Nov 5, 2013
    You obviously are affected by it, you're here complaining and whining

    "What stylistic nightmare?"

    I'm just giving my expert advice, nothing else. Believe it or not, I don't give a ****. :smoke
     
  14. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    And what advantages are they that he didn't have over Maidana?hahaha
     
  15. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,613
    Nov 5, 2013
    The problem was that he made too far of a jump up in weight classes. That was his biggest problem, that was it. If Broner had fought him after being more comfortable @ 47, I know Broner would have won.