Rank the Divisions.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Feb 27, 2014.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,606
    47,855
    Feb 11, 2005
    It seems a good 80% of the threads on here regard the big boys. Yet, I find that division, over the course of the sport's modern history. I am curious how others rank the traditional 8 in terms of historical excellence, depth and consistency.

    Here I go...

    1) Middleweight
    2) Welterweight
    3) Lightweight
    4) Bantamweight
    5) Heavyweight
    6) Lightheavy
    7) Featherweight
    8) Flyweight
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,422
    48,850
    Mar 21, 2007
    1 - Lightweight
    2 - Middleweight
    3 - Welterweight
    4 - Bantamweight
    5 - Featherweight
    6 - Light-heavyweight
    7 - Heavyweight
    8 - Flyweight
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,606
    47,855
    Feb 11, 2005
    Upon second look, I actually prefer yours to mine with the exception of Middle being number two. Lightheavy is more consistently great over the long haul than the heavies.
     
  4. WhyYouLittle

    WhyYouLittle Stand Still Full Member

    1,372
    21
    Jul 13, 2012
    MW
    LW
    WW
    BW
    LHW
    FW
    HW
    FLW

    Funny, partially agree with both lists.
     
  5. alahopsk

    alahopsk New Member Full Member

    42
    14
    Feb 21, 2014
    I don't see how you could possibly put LHW under HW. There have been far more excellent LHW's than HW's.
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,606
    47,855
    Feb 11, 2005
    And yet, the top ten topics today on this board regard heavyweights. It makes me think that perhaps most in these parts don't know much beyond one of the least successful divisions in the sport.
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,583
    Nov 24, 2005
    Heavyweight is underrated precisely because people have become so familiar with it.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,422
    48,850
    Mar 21, 2007
    There's something to that. But gravity and body mechanics and all that **** makes it difficult for the big guys. With only a tiny handful of exceptions they're just never going to look as good as the lightweights, the weltereweights.
     
  9. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,585
    1,921
    Sep 9, 2011
    lw
    ww
    mw
    fw
    lhw
    bw
    hw
    flw

    i expected to put hw last tbh, but the extra £$£$ for hw's probably attracted more guys than min weight.

    the most thought was between feather and middle.
     
  10. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,255
    Feb 6, 2009
    It's still HW at the top then these
    MW
    WW (my old boxing division)
    LW
    FW
    LHW
    Fly
    Bantam
     
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,470
    Sep 7, 2008
    Fly over feather.
     
  12. Jester

    Jester Active Member Full Member

    885
    456
    Jul 27, 2014
    1. Welterweight
    2. Middleweight
    3. Lightweight
    4. Featherweight
    5. Heavyweight
    6. Light Heavyweight
    7. Bantamweight
    8. Flyweight

    Heavyweight and Featherweight are kinda interchangeable for me.
     
  13. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    105
    115
    Fat
    Not that fat
    Regular size
    Your Small cousin
    You're a girl size
    Big Dog
    Small pony
    Smaller than average
    A little bigger than average
    A little heftier than the cousin
    Fat girl
    Skinny girl
    Fun size
    Skinny dude average height
     
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,606
    47,855
    Feb 11, 2005
    No, heavyweights have always sucked except for brief flickers in the 70's and 90's...
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,470
    Sep 7, 2008
    Bantam is one of the very strongest along with welter, light and middle I think.