The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

In fairness Robinson would win every round against Mayweather.

Pac's aggression would get him KO'd.

Robinson was the ultimate fighting machine.

 

Ray Leonard at welter maybe but I think he stop him inside the distance

 

I disagree, I think Floyd does fairly well against all ATG's, but I think Hearns taps him. I just think that style is just all wrong for him.

 

Maybe Sweet Pea Whitaker.

 

I think it means a lot when we talking about elite fighters such as Mayweather. Great champions like Hopkins, De La Hoya, and Moseley all took losses. But like Mayweather said to his little brother (Broner), true champions always bounce back. I think everyone would be curious to see how Mayweather would respond to a loss. If it ever happens, I'm sure the initial reaction will be a huge shock. But then as the dust settles, we would all remember it's just a sport.

Mayweather obviously has never been beaten professionally. But I'm sure he's taken an L in sparring before. And I know he lost in amateurs growing up. So he would be able to deal with it i'm sure.

 

everybody on this forum shits on a fighter after he loses. If you're discussing the fighter, they'll bring up his single loss as to why that fighter sucks (example: Donaire sucks. He got school by Rigondeaux).

So obviously we all must love undefeated fighters. RIGHT? Or are we all a bunch of hypocrites who are never pleased with anything a fighter does

 

Here's your answer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2QDss_SwtQ

 

Nah, Floyd's underrated against head to head vs ATG fighters but would get very little done against Robinson.

At welterweight, he was virtually invincible.Mayweather would have to be ultra-defensive to avoid being knocked out but Robinson would still score with his smooth, diverse, offensive attack.

 

where will floyd be if it wasnt for his 0? will he be on the news every day? will he be called p4p number 1? he will continue to pad his record to maintain that status and paycheck

 

No. What matters is the level of competition and HOW you win and WHO you beat. Not just how mch you win.

There is no undefeated boxer in the history of the sport that fought all time great competition that were in their prime - that include rocky calzaghe lopez And floyd

 

Depends who and how took his zero, if a can crusher like wilder steps up and gets outboxed by Wlad it's ok, but if he steps up and gets knocked out by featherfisted malik scott ,then I'll write him off.

 

Exactly This :deal

 

Being Undefeated is an amazing feat as long as it leads to big fights.

Deontay Wilder is a good example, unlike Mayweather he is willing to take a risky fight vs Wlad when Wlad is ready

 

That zero is meaningless unless there are some solid victories over prime A-Class
fighters!:bart

 

A real A class fighter...makes other fighters c class :good