Who are the most successful fighters in history with the least natural talent??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jas, Mar 3, 2014.

  1. jas

    jas ★ Legends: B-HOP ; PAC ★ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Messages:
    16,150
    Likes Received:
    12
    Who are the most successful fighters in history with the least natural or "God-given" talent?

    Natural boxing talents:

    - Speed
    - Power
    - Athleticism
    - Chin
    - Cuts

    Posters have said:

    - Hopkins
    - Marquez
    - Valuev
    - Paulie
    - Winky
    - Rosi (no idea who he is)
     
  2. jas

    jas ★ Legends: B-HOP ; PAC ★ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Messages:
    16,150
    Likes Received:
    12
    Bhop comes to mind with the first three categories but he has a good chin and never gets cut .
     
  3. Collie

    Collie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2012
    Messages:
    8,638
    Likes Received:
    8
    I always thought Hopkins got amazingly far who didn't have one standout great characteristic such as speed power or athleticism. Obviously he was decent in all areas but far from gifted, his chin was obviously good though and had elite IQ, toughness and footwork. But he is probably one of the greatest fighters without standout typical attributes such as speed, power or athleticism. His dedication probably helped him to over-achieve imo.
     
  4. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    38,553
    Likes Received:
    8,119
    So someone who's featherfisted, slow as **** without any chin and cuts easily?
     
  5. jas

    jas ★ Legends: B-HOP ; PAC ★ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Messages:
    16,150
    Likes Received:
    12
    Great summary.
    Does anyone else come to mind Collie??? I'm researching as we speak.
     
  6. LondonRingRules

    LondonRingRules Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2011
    Messages:
    10,519
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Someone without ANY of those things? I'm guessing someone who got to regional level and managed to win a local belt. I don't think there's been any national or world level boxers with absolutely none of those things.
     
  7. jas

    jas ★ Legends: B-HOP ; PAC ★ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Messages:
    16,150
    Likes Received:
    12
    Pretty much but he ain't gotta be all of them....
     
  8. Collie

    Collie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2012
    Messages:
    8,638
    Likes Received:
    8
    Got in before me.

    Maybe JMM? Although he has decent pop, his best characteristic is probably his ring IQ which isn't a God given talent as such.

    Would Andre Ward fit the bill? He has decent speed, not great power or athleticism as such, chin isn't certified iron but he rarely needs it. He dominates practically all of his opponents.
     
  9. jas

    jas ★ Legends: B-HOP ; PAC ★ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Messages:
    16,150
    Likes Received:
    12
    No... Someone at world level with the LEAST natural talent, encompassing a combination of any of those things.

    Essentially, what I'm asking is who are the biggest over-achievers in history?
     
  10. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,656
    Likes Received:
    710
    Guys , guys , guys , come on really???

    Bernard had great speed and athleticism.

    He had quicker hands than Calzaghe , just not the work rate. Was way quicker than Pavlik, and when it comes to athleticism he kept up with a prime Roy!!!

    Gents you really need to understand what you are watching before making these comments , its embarrassing.
     
  11. LondonRingRules

    LondonRingRules Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2011
    Messages:
    10,519
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Ah right okay I get you.

    Malignaggi comes to mind, he isn't exceptionally fast, no power, swells up a lot, became a 2 time world champ...done pretty well for himself I'd say.
     
  12. the commentator

    the commentator Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,476
    Likes Received:
    273
    John "the boring man" Ruiz comes to mind...:barf
     
  13. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    28,160
    Likes Received:
    32
    valuev
     
  14. jas

    jas ★ Legends: B-HOP ; PAC ★ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Messages:
    16,150
    Likes Received:
    12
    who had more speed? bernard or roy? and who was more successful?
     
  15. LondonRingRules

    LondonRingRules Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2011
    Messages:
    10,519
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Great shout.