Holyfield is apparently losing it

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TheExpertboxer, Mar 2, 2014.


  1. derrick

    derrick 6ft4 215 bring it on Full Member

    7,534
    215
    Dec 31, 2004
    No a shemale is a man. If you had *** with him you may be gay.
     
  2. Spoorloos

    Spoorloos IfPacKOsTimImgone90days Full Member

    1,428
    3
    Jan 18, 2014
    OK thanks for clearing that up.
    Didn't do it then obviously :good
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,153
    85,030
    Nov 30, 2006
    Postoperative? :think
     
  4. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    Even after surgery its still a man.

    In the old days, they called them Eunuchs. Today, they call them TV network/Media owners, TV producers, TV directors and fashion designers.

    What are you if you bounce a Eunuch?
     
  5. Spoorloos

    Spoorloos IfPacKOsTimImgone90days Full Member

    1,428
    3
    Jan 18, 2014
    What is gayer, being turned on by a postoperative shemale or not being turned on by her/him/it/whatever? :?
    I'm so confused...
    Please clear that up for me I think I might have caught zee gayness :yikes
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,153
    85,030
    Nov 30, 2006
    A eunuch and trans***ual are not the same thing. :lol: Your ignorance is breathtaking.
     
  7. Spoorloos

    Spoorloos IfPacKOsTimImgone90days Full Member

    1,428
    3
    Jan 18, 2014
    But an eunuch doesn't have a vagina nor a *****.
    Shemales preoperative have a ***** and post-op a vagina.
    Then there are those hermaphrodites that have both a ***** AND a vagina!!!
    I'm doing a little research here on google man and it's mind-blowing :yikes
     
  8. Spoorloos

    Spoorloos IfPacKOsTimImgone90days Full Member

    1,428
    3
    Jan 18, 2014
    derrick, I think I get what you say, if it ever was a man, it's gay.
    Problem is: postoperative you can't seperate them from real woman, so it is theoretically possible that you bang somebody that has previously been a man without ever knowing.
     
  9. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,455
    3,916
    Feb 20, 2008

    Has nothing tom do with losing to Lewis I can tell you that much. This was specific information I would have rather not been told.
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,153
    85,030
    Nov 30, 2006
    I guess what you're saying is the best preventative measure that can be taken is total abstinence? :think ...so guys like derrick & Guru ought to become 100% a***ual, never being with any women (so as to not accidentally screw an ex-man) and thereby never procreating?



    ...meaning less idiot genes passed on...
     
  11. Spoorloos

    Spoorloos IfPacKOsTimImgone90days Full Member

    1,428
    3
    Jan 18, 2014
    It's the only way to be 100% sure not to do something extremely gay, so I would say this conclusion is valid :rofl
     
  12. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    Enlighten me Old wise one.

    What's the difference between two men who have had their Johnson's cut off? The same Johnsons that their genetics determined that each should possess.
    LOL! Stick to the basics and don't confuse yourself with complications. :lol:
     
  13. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    THINK!!!!

    It really ain't illegal, yet! :good:patsch

    Actually, threads like this should be in the lounge
     
  14. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    dunno if that was a serious question? But you never heard of Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution?
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,153
    85,030
    Nov 30, 2006
    ...in which he never once claims we descend from monkeys?

    Rather, both the platyrrhine & catarrhine "monkeys" (did you even know there are two completely different groups of animals called monkeys? ;)) as well as homo sapiens and the great apes derive from a common ancestor. (most likely Eosimias)